2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-019-05567-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges with Accuracy of Gender Fields in Identifying Transgender Patients in Electronic Health Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Systems-level improvements within existing health care services are needed to address barriers to care for TGD people. This study brings new perspective to the body of work concerning community member and HCP perspectives regarding an ideal gender-affirming services within the healthcare system [ 6 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Systems-level improvements within existing health care services are needed to address barriers to care for TGD people. This study brings new perspective to the body of work concerning community member and HCP perspectives regarding an ideal gender-affirming services within the healthcare system [ 6 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is therefore a significant need for research that extends our understanding of contemporary barriers to providing accessible and affirming health services for TGD populations. The existing literature on barriers to gender-affirming health care has identified several key contributors: paucity of trained health care professionals (HCPs) [ 6 9 ], uncoordinated care [ 10 , 11 ], unnecessary gatekeeping [ 11 13 ], insurance exclusions [ 11 , 14 , 15 ], and electronic health record (EHR) systems that preclude collection of data specific to TGD populations [ 16 18 ]. Many of these barriers are amplified in rural areas, and additional challenges have been documented in non-urban settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small sample size also limits the ability to perform quality multivariable regressions and control for confounders due to small overall numbers in each subgroup. Also, by relying on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes for participant identification, it is possible that we may have missed TGWWH who would have qualified for inclusion but did not have the codes we searched [ 32 ]. Lastly, as a retrospective cohort study, it is impossible to control for unmeasured confounders or to determine causality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the largest barriers to having valid and reliable outcomes data for transgender individuals is that most national surveys do not include options to identify people who are transgender or gender diverse, instead defaulting to male and female sex markers [ 14 , 15 ]. There are robust data that support the use of a two-step question, i.e., asking both gender identity and sex assigned at birth (Table 1 ), to improve identification of transgender individuals for both clinical care and research [ 16 – 18 ].…”
Section: Identification Of Transgender Individuals For Research and C...mentioning
confidence: 99%