2021
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202100056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges to the Success of Commercial Organic Photovoltaic Products

Abstract: Recent advances in the development of organic photovoltaic (OPV) materials has led to significant improvements in device performance; now closing in on the 20% efficiency threshold. Despite these improvements in performance, the commercial viability of organic photovoltaic products remains elusive. In this perspective, the current limitations of high performing blends are uncovered, particularly focusing on the industrial upscaling considerations of these materials, such as synthetic scalability, active layer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 46 Similarly, Po et al explored the synthetic complexity (SC) of active layer donor polymers 47 and NFAs, 48 while Moser et al introduced a simplified metric termed as scalability factor (SF) accounting for the semiconductor synthetic cost. 49 Based on our cost analysis, close to 50% of the overall device cost is solely ascribed to the obtainment of the raw semiconducting materials (see Table S1 in the ESI † ), which highlights the importance of identifying both high performing and ‘ click-synthetized’ molecular candidates. In general, the device cost is proportional to the total number of synthetic steps required by each of the organic semiconductors employed, which is affected as well by their synthetic yield.…”
Section: Computational Toolbox For Opv Materials (Pre)screeningmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 46 Similarly, Po et al explored the synthetic complexity (SC) of active layer donor polymers 47 and NFAs, 48 while Moser et al introduced a simplified metric termed as scalability factor (SF) accounting for the semiconductor synthetic cost. 49 Based on our cost analysis, close to 50% of the overall device cost is solely ascribed to the obtainment of the raw semiconducting materials (see Table S1 in the ESI † ), which highlights the importance of identifying both high performing and ‘ click-synthetized’ molecular candidates. In general, the device cost is proportional to the total number of synthetic steps required by each of the organic semiconductors employed, which is affected as well by their synthetic yield.…”
Section: Computational Toolbox For Opv Materials (Pre)screeningmentioning
confidence: 86%
“… 50 In this regard, the donor polymer known as PTQ10 has emerged as a very cost-effective counterpart for upscaling due to its great balance between synthetic cost and performance (PCE/SF = 0.53) when blended with NFAs from the Y-series. 49 On the other hand, state-of-the-art low bandgap polymers including PBDB-T and their halogenated derivatives do not exceed the PCE/SF threshold of 0.4. According to this report, ternary blends including low SF semiconductors (such as P3HT) are prominent alternatives from the economic perspective since they have as high PCE/SF values as the PTQ10-based devices.…”
Section: Computational Toolbox For Opv Materials (Pre)screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the rapid progress being made for OSCs in recent years, [1][2][3][4] with the power conversion efficiency (PCE) surpassing 18%, [5][6][7][8][9] efforts are still needed to push OSCs toward the practical relevance. 10,11 There are great demands for the development of high-performance and low-cost photovoltaic materials, [12][13][14] yet being rare. Inorganic metal oxides (MOs) can potentially be scaled up with low costs, such as zinc oxides (ZnOs), which have been employed in OSCs as electron transport layers (ETLs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27][28][29] Semitransparent solar cells for building integrated photovoltaic technology, [30] green house applications, [31][32][33] and the technologies are at the edge to commercialization. [34] Despite great achievements made in recent years on OSCs, the insufficient photon harvesting is still a limitation to the PCE improvement in the single BHJ (combination of one D and one A) OSCs due to the intrinsically narrow absorption window of organic materials. To improve the photon harvesting of the active layer, the ternary OSCs [35][36][37][38][39][40] and tandem OSCs [41,42] have been successfully used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%