Challenges to the assessment of competence and competencies.

Abstract

Challenges to the assessment of competence and competencies in professional psychology are discussed in this article. These include difficulties in defining competencies in precise and measurable terms; reaching agreement within the profession about the key elements of each competence domain; establishing an armamentarium of tools for assessing all components of competence, including the knowledge base, skills, and attitudes (and their integration); determining appropriate agreed-upon minimal levels of competence for individuals at different levels of professional development and when "competence problems" exist for individuals; assuring the fidelity of competency assessments; and establishing mechanisms for providing effective evaluative feedback and remediation. But even if these challenges JAMES W. LICHTENBERG received his PhD in counseling psychology from the University of Minnesota. He is a professor of counseling psychology and the associate dean for graduate programs and research at the University of Kansas. His areas of professional interest and research include social interaction processes and dynamics, legal and ethical issues in counseling and psychotherapy, and clinical training. SANFORD M. PORTNOY received his PhD in clinical psychology from the University of Massachusetts. He is on the faculty of the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology, where he serves as director of the Center for the Study of Psychology and Divorce, and is a member of Needham Psychotherapy Associates in Needham, Massachusetts, and of Portnoy Associates in Newton, Massachusetts. His professional and research interests include the psychology of divorce and the effects of the legal divorce process on families, couples therapy, and teaching legal professionals the skills to relate more effectively to their clients. MURIEL J. BEBEAU received her PhD in educational psychology from Arizona State University. She is a professor in the School of Dentistry at the University of Minnesota, faculty associate in the university's Center for Bioethics, and director of the Center for the Study of Ethical Development. Her scholarly work integrates the psychology of morality with ethics and dentistry to design and validate assessment strategies and teaching methods to promote professional ethical development. IRENE W. LEIGH received her PhD in clinical psychology from New York University. She is a professor in the clinical psychology doctoral program at Gallaudet University in Washington, DC. Her presentations, research, and publications have focused on deaf people and issues related to identity, multiculturalism, parenting, attachment, depression, and cochlear implants. PAUL D. NELSON received his PhD from the University of Chicago. He recently retired as the deputy director of education and director of graduate and postdoctoral education and training for the Education Directorate of the American Psychological Association. His focus has been on graduate and postgraduate education and training. NANCY J. RUBIN received her PsyD in clinical...

The competencies initiative in American professional psychology: Implications for school psychology preparation

“…Lichtenberg et al (2007) point out that defining constructs is complex in practice settings where trainees are expected to display higher order skills and that the complexity of performance settings may actually limit the generalizability of results from one setting to another. In other words, it is not possible to know at this time whether a competent display of skills with a particular case or type of case means that the trainee will display the same level of competence with other cases that have more or less the same features.…”

A conceptual and empirical review of the meaning, measurement, development, and teaching of intervention competence in clinical psychology

“…Further, assessors must necessarily face the reality of multiple paradigms. The particular difficulties involved in this issue may be responsible for some of the resistances to assessment described by Lichtenberg et al (2007).…”

The Effectiveness and Cost of Clinical Supervision for Motivational Interviewing: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Through the use of distinct supervisory competencies (American Psychological Association, 2015; Borders et al, 2011; Falender & Shafranske, 2012; Bernard & Goodyear, 2014), clinical supervision has been shown to benefit clinicians by increasing their treatment knowledge, confidence, and skill (Beutler & Kendall, 1995; Holloway & Neufeldt, 1995; Wheeler & Richards, 2007). However, little empirical attention has been given to the effectiveness of clinical supervision on improving client outcomes, considered by many to be the “acid test” by which clinical supervision should be judged (Bernard & Goodyear, 2014; Ellis & Ladany, 1997; Falender & Shafranske, 2012; Lichtenberg et al, 2007). In addition, no studies have detailed the cost of supervising clinical practice, a surprising void in the literature given the widespread use of clinical supervision for training purposes.…”