Challenges to Li7La3Zr2O12 system electrolyte and the modification: From powder to ceramic

Xiao, Yiyang; Yang, Juanyu; Wang, Ning; Zhang, Xiaobao; Liang, Shiang; Zhao, Huan; Du, Lei; Chen, Jun; Huang, Xiaowei

doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.174123

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 201 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their excellent extensibility and toughness render them highly promising in the field of flexible batteries. However, challenges such as low ionic conductivity, poor structural stability, and flammability must be addressed. , Oxide-based SEs are primarily divided into four categories: perovskite-type represented by Li 3 x La 2/3– x TiO 3 , , NASICON-type represented by Li 1+ x Al x Ti 2– x (PO 4 ) 3 , LISICON-type represented by Li 2+2 x Zn 1– x SiO 4 , and garnet-type represented by Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO). − Oxide-based high SEs exhibit great electrical ionic conducting properties, a wide electrochemical stability window (ESW), and superior strength of machinery, making them the most hopeful cases for practical application among SEs. , …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Wang,

Li,

et al. 2024

Energy Fuels

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the pursuit of advancements within the realm of solid-state lithium metal batteries, considerable attention has been directed toward the garnet-type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) material owing to its exceptional lithium stability, elevated ionic conductivity at room temperature, compatibility with high operating voltages, and environmentally friendly low-cost production methodologies. Despite these merits, the widespread utilization of LLZO in conjunction with a lithium anode is significantly impeded by the emergence of high interfacial resistance and interface lithium dendrite growth issues. When these challenges are addressed, this paper comprehensively examines the mechanistic underpinnings of interface issues arising from the interaction between LLZO and a lithium anode. Furthermore, it surveys the latest advancements and improvement methodologies employed to mitigate these concerns, aiming to propel the advancement of solid-state battery technology.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Wang,

Li,

et al. 2024

Energy Fuels

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ceramic Rich Composite Electrolytes: An Overview of Paradigm Shift toward Solid Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium‐Metal Batteries

Maurya,

Bazri,

Srivastava

et al. 2024

Advanced Energy Materials

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Exploiting the synergy between organic polymer electrolytes and inorganic electrolytes via the development of composite electrolytes can suggest solutions to the current challenges of next‐generation solid‐state lithium‐metal batteries (SSLMBs). Depending upon a mass fraction of inorganic fillers and organic polymers, composite electrolytes are broadly classified into “ceramic‐in‐polymer” (CIP) and “polymer‐in‐ceramic” (PIC) categories, inheriting distinct structure and electrochemical properties. Since the stability and electrochemical characteristics of the inorganic phase are superior to those of the organic phase for lithium‐ion conduction, applying lithium‐enrich active filler in PIC seems more promising. The inorganic phase preserves the primary migratory channels in the PIC electrolyte, while the viscoelastic properties attempt to be introduced from the organic binder or host. The present work overviews the studies on state‐of‐the‐art PIC electrolytes, the fundamental mechanism of ionic conduction, preparation methods, and current progress in materials development for SSLMBs. In addition, the modification strategies for improving the electrode–electrolyte interface are also emphasized. Moreover, it further prospects the current challenges and effective strategies for the future development of PICs‐based CPEs to accelerate the practical application of SSLMBs. This review examines the progress and outlook of PIC‐based electrolytes for next‐generation lithium batteries.

show abstract

Challenges to Li7La3Zr2O12 system electrolyte and the modification: From powder to ceramic

Cited by 2 publications

References 201 publications

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Ceramic Rich Composite Electrolytes: An Overview of Paradigm Shift toward Solid Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium‐Metal Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Challenges to Li7La3Zr2O12 system electrolyte and the modification: From powder to ceramic

Cited by 2 publications

References 201 publications

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Ceramic Rich Composite Electrolytes: An Overview of Paradigm Shift toward Solid Electrolytes for High‐Performance Lithium‐Metal Batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives

Review on Interface Issues between a Garnet Li₇La₃Zr₂O₁₂ Solid Electrolyte and Li Anode: Advances and Perspectives