2013
DOI: 10.1921/6104030204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of prolonged transition from totalitarian system to liberal democracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is critical that external influences are consistent with the principles that the innovators are attempting to establish. For example, using the case of mental disability [ 23 ] show how European Structural funds may serve to maintain large institutions over community care, and thereby prolong the soviet style marginalization and stigmatization of dependent people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is critical that external influences are consistent with the principles that the innovators are attempting to establish. For example, using the case of mental disability [ 23 ] show how European Structural funds may serve to maintain large institutions over community care, and thereby prolong the soviet style marginalization and stigmatization of dependent people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents mentioned more or less active involvement of the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, and Ministry of Social Affairs, as well as the problems of weak coordination among them. This centralization of responsibilities, which also implies the inequality and dominance of powerful groups, fairly echoes the situation in Soviet times, when the main purposes of the internat system was physical care and isolation of “defective” individuals (Puras et al, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, non-governmental organizations (hereafter NGOs) visited residential care institutions for persons with ID and stated that these institutions not only violate fundamental human rights, but that repressions and restrictions are still applied, manifestations of sexual and physical abuse have also been reported (Puras, Sumskiene and Adomaityte-Subaciene 2013).…”
Section: Institutional Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CEEC are especially criticized for using the structural funds to perpetuate the outdated systems of institutional care. More than two decades of numerous attempts to promote changes have not resulted so far in a change of paradigm, as institutional culture and a tradition of exclusion still remain very strong (Puras, Sumskiene and Adomaityte-Subaciene 2013).…”
Section: Institutional Carementioning
confidence: 99%