2015
DOI: 10.3390/ani5020173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of Managing Animals in Disasters in the U.S.

Abstract: Simple SummaryThis article describes common challenges to managing animals in disasters in the US, summarizes how some of these challenges are being met and makes recommendations on how to overcome others. Many predictable adverse situations affecting animals and their owners can be prevented when communities develop a comprehensive emergency management strategy that integrates animal care into planning, preparedness, mitigation, and recovery activities, as well as response.AbstractCommon to many of the repeat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
46
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Emergencies can occur when people, property, the environment and other assets (including animals) intersect adversely with hazards 4 . Animals may be considered ‘dependent others’ and their welfare is frequently linked to human physical and psychological health 24–26 . For livestock farmers, an economic relationship does not exclude emotional attachment and both are considerations at the responder‐owner interface 20,24,27 …”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergencies can occur when people, property, the environment and other assets (including animals) intersect adversely with hazards 4 . Animals may be considered ‘dependent others’ and their welfare is frequently linked to human physical and psychological health 24–26 . For livestock farmers, an economic relationship does not exclude emotional attachment and both are considerations at the responder‐owner interface 20,24,27 …”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive emergency management includes four factors (i.e. all kinds of hazards, all stakeholders, four phases of emergency management lifetime, and all risks) whose goal is to protect people as well as animals (Heath and Linnabary 2015).…”
Section: Implications and Recommendations To Neighbouring Nationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of failures to plan in advance, ad hoc responses to meet the needs of animals have been a recurring feature in disasters (Heath & Linnabary, 2015) and there has been a tendency for individual HSOs to fail to incorporate, or to ignore, the human-animal bond in their planning and operations. There are a range of practical barriers that, in ignoring this bond, may prevent evacuation with companion animals, such as difficulty finding pet-friendly accommodation and inability to transport animals (Heath et al, 2001;Hunt et al, 2012).…”
Section: Animal-inclusive Planning In Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergency shelters are often ill equipped to take companion animals and evacuees are likely to face difficulties finding accommodation such as rental housing that is willing to accept companion animals (Evans & Perez-y-Perez, 2013). Recognising this, HSOs may be able to proactively identify pet-friendly accommodation for evacuees and those requiring re-housing following a disaster, and to ensure that HSO workers and service users are aware of their existence (Heath & Linnabary, 2015;Hunt et al, 2012). HSOs may also be able to work with animal welfare organisations such as the Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (SPCA) and animal-fostering groups to make sure that emergency shelters for animals are available and accessible to evacuees (Morley & Fook, 2005).…”
Section: Animal-inclusive Planning In Organisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation