2017
DOI: 10.1002/epa2.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges of Citizen Participation in Infrastructure Policy‐Making in Multi‐Level Systems—The Case of Onshore Wind Energy Expansion in Germany

Abstract: The German Energy Transition is one of the most important and largest infrastructure projects and one of the most significant challenges to German policy‐making. Empirical studies provide evidence for the notion that participation in the decision making process shapes local acceptance of renewable energy technology expansion. In the context of the German Energy Transition, the emphasis on participation in decision making processes seems to involve a paradox. Many different participatory measures have been impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another example is the German Energy Transition infrastructure project, which is considered to be a “wicked” issue in the analysis of Fraune and Knodt (). The authors focus on the bottom‐up processes concerning the citizen dialogue ( agency ) on the future use of wind energy technologies, and how they did not result in “throughput” legitimacy/acceptance of the wind energy expansion, both from the process angle of this concept, which looks at transparency, deliberation and the inclusion of voices based on structural constraints (Schmidt, ), as well as the outcome angle of “acceptability.” The lack of throughput legitimacy was due to the fact that the citizen participation took place mainly near the metropolitan areas while it was the rural population ( agency ) that would be more affected by the wind energy expansions.…”
Section: Multi‐level Governance and Problem‐solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another example is the German Energy Transition infrastructure project, which is considered to be a “wicked” issue in the analysis of Fraune and Knodt (). The authors focus on the bottom‐up processes concerning the citizen dialogue ( agency ) on the future use of wind energy technologies, and how they did not result in “throughput” legitimacy/acceptance of the wind energy expansion, both from the process angle of this concept, which looks at transparency, deliberation and the inclusion of voices based on structural constraints (Schmidt, ), as well as the outcome angle of “acceptability.” The lack of throughput legitimacy was due to the fact that the citizen participation took place mainly near the metropolitan areas while it was the rural population ( agency ) that would be more affected by the wind energy expansions.…”
Section: Multi‐level Governance and Problem‐solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors focus on the bottom‐up processes concerning the citizen dialogue ( agency ) on the future use of wind energy technologies, and how they did not result in “throughput” legitimacy/acceptance of the wind energy expansion, both from the process angle of this concept, which looks at transparency, deliberation and the inclusion of voices based on structural constraints (Schmidt, ), as well as the outcome angle of “acceptability.” The lack of throughput legitimacy was due to the fact that the citizen participation took place mainly near the metropolitan areas while it was the rural population ( agency ) that would be more affected by the wind energy expansions. The fact that the multi‐level governance of the Germany Energy Transition was not properly implemented in the process of problem‐solving resulted ( outcome ) in a lack of acceptability of the expansion (Fraune & Knodt, ).…”
Section: Multi‐level Governance and Problem‐solvingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Somehow OAM implies an undefined, but permanent, re-arrangement among level of governments. For these reasons, it seems particularly suitable for analyzing contemporary networked patterns of government and multilevel governance (Agranoff & Radin, 2015; see also Ingold & Pflieger, 2016;Fraune & Knodt, 2017).…”
Section: Change In the Pattern And Games Of Power In The Igrsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first special issue contribution, Fraune and Knodt (2017) study citizen participation in the German multi-level system with the case of onshore wind energy expansion. As mentioned above in this introduction, the Energy Transition is one of the most important and largest infrastructure projects in Germany.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%