2017
DOI: 10.4236/ijcm.2017.86039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in the Management of Sepsis in a Resource-Poor Setting

Abstract: Background: Sepsis is a deleterious host reaction to microorganism and can lead to high mortality rate. Early recognition and prompt treatment increases the chances of survival. Objective: To outline the challenges in the management of sepsis in a resource limited setting and make appropriate recommendations. Methodology: The data was collected through an online literature search for cases of sepsis managed in resource limited settings from 1990 to 2015. Search terms used included: "sepsis", "septicaemia", "in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is strongly suggestive of increased CVR that is most consistent with intracranial hypertension in this clinical scenario. Due to poverty, lack of reasonably distanced health centers, and many other factors, late presentation to care is common in resource-limited settings (45,46). The high proportion of children identified with low CBFVs compared with other previous reports from other settings may be reflective of advanced disease at the time of admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This finding is strongly suggestive of increased CVR that is most consistent with intracranial hypertension in this clinical scenario. Due to poverty, lack of reasonably distanced health centers, and many other factors, late presentation to care is common in resource-limited settings (45,46). The high proportion of children identified with low CBFVs compared with other previous reports from other settings may be reflective of advanced disease at the time of admission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%