2022
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Mediation Analyses

Abstract: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of mediation studies are increasingly being implemented in practice. Nonetheless, the methodology for conducting such review and analysis is still in a development phase, with much room for improvement. In this paper, we highlight and discuss challenges that investigators face in mediation systematic reviews and meta-analyses, then propose ways of accommodating these in practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the assumption that the selected mediator-outcome confounders appropriately represent all outcome and mediator predictors that are differentially distributed across RCTs, current analyses adequately address potential heterogeneity between included RCTs. 17 The lack of a measure for radiographic OA in several RCTs could obviously challenge these assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption that the selected mediator-outcome confounders appropriately represent all outcome and mediator predictors that are differentially distributed across RCTs, current analyses adequately address potential heterogeneity between included RCTs. 17 The lack of a measure for radiographic OA in several RCTs could obviously challenge these assumptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%