Challenges in quantifying and characterizing dissolved organic carbon: Sampling, isolation, storage, and analysis

Abstract

Despite the advancements in analytical techniques, there are still great challenges and difficulties in accurately and effectively quantifying and characterizing dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in environmental samples. The objectives of this review paper are (a) to understand the roles and variability of DOC along the water continuum; (b) to identify the constraints, inconsistences, limitations, and artifacts in DOC characterization; and (c) to provide recommendations and remarks to improve the analytical accuracy. For the first objective, we summarize the four ecological and engineering roles of DOC along the water continuum from source water to municipal utility, including nutrients and energy sources, controlling the fates of micropollutants, buffering capacity, and treatability and precursors of disinfection byproducts. We also discuss three major challenges in DOC analysis, including spatial and temporal variations, degradability and stability, and unknown structures and formulas. For the second objective, we review the procedures and steps in DOC analysis, including sampling in diverse environmental matrices, isolation of DOC fraction, storage and preservation techniques, and analyses on bulk chemical characteristics. We list and discuss the available options and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each choice. Last, we provide recommendations and remarks for each stage: sampling, isolation, storage, and analysis.

Fostering Adequate Data Reporting of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry-Based Environmental Studies

“…Field samples are known to be highly complex and heterogeneous. As such, unbiased sample collection representing the desired field conditions is critical for a solid environmental study. − The description of field experiments should present exactly what, where, and how authors conducted, including but not limited to, sampling design, field conditions, storage, and extraction of analytes . The justification of the choice of the sampling points and time should also be clearly explained.…”

“…In addition to the time and location discussed above, the detailed sampling protocol, including the number of replications, volume or mass used in composite samples (if any), sampling device used, types of containers, duration of storage, materials of filtration membrane and solid phase extraction, glassware cleaning procedures, and the special handling procedure to avoid potential contamination or degradation during storage, should be carefully planned and performed. FT-ICR MS is a highly sensitive analytical technique such that a minor discrepancy could impact the composition of NOM in samples and consequently, the results of the analysis. − In addition, reporting blank and certified reference controls and replicate injections of 10–20% of the samples have been recommended for quality assurance and control . Such information is, however, often inadvertently neglected in research articles.…”

Clean Water Act at 50: Celebrating the golden anniversary of the blue policy

“…Two papers in this special section are forward looking. One highlights considerations for sampling and analysis of dissolved organic carbon in water samples (Chow et al, 2022). Organic carbon provides an important energy source to heterotrophic biota in water bodies and can thus have vast implications on its ecological status.…”

Toward the future of OECD/ISO biodegradability testing-new approaches and developments

“…At present, there are no automated systems that can solve the difficulties caused by the filtration of the sample to estimate the dissolved part of the carbon. Other parameters such as the oxidation of the test chemical and, moreover, for UVCBs chemical mixtures compromise the design of an automated instrument (Chow et al 2022 ).…”