2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4256-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in predicting and simulating summer rainfall in the eastern China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In East Asia (0 -50 N, 100 -160 E), the overall skill is low and shows obvious regional dependence, with the relatively high skill areas over tropics and western North Pacific, and low skill areas over eastern China, the Korean Peninsula, and Japan. That is consistent with the fact of low predictability for summer rainfall over the mid-high latitude land demonstrated in previous work (e.g., Liang et al, 2009Liang et al, , 2019Gao et al, 2011). In MME (Figure 1e), relatively higher skill is in the tropics and subtropical western North Pacific (WNP), as well as in the region between the Yangtze and Yellow River valleys in eastern China (between 30 and 38 N), while negative TCC is seen in South China and North China.…”
Section: Prediction Skillssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In East Asia (0 -50 N, 100 -160 E), the overall skill is low and shows obvious regional dependence, with the relatively high skill areas over tropics and western North Pacific, and low skill areas over eastern China, the Korean Peninsula, and Japan. That is consistent with the fact of low predictability for summer rainfall over the mid-high latitude land demonstrated in previous work (e.g., Liang et al, 2009Liang et al, , 2019Gao et al, 2011). In MME (Figure 1e), relatively higher skill is in the tropics and subtropical western North Pacific (WNP), as well as in the region between the Yangtze and Yellow River valleys in eastern China (between 30 and 38 N), while negative TCC is seen in South China and North China.…”
Section: Prediction Skillssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Among these four models, ECMWF_SYS4 is better than other models, while NCEP_CFS2 is the worst one for simulating SLP, u850 and v850, particularly for LM3 and LM4. The MME result is better than or close to the best model (Yuan and Wood, ; Becker et al, ; Liu et al, ; Liang et al, ). For some models and variables, the no sole linear decline of the skill with increase of lead time may be due to the impact of small sample size and interruption of internal dynamical processes driven variability (Deser et al, ).…”
Section: Prediction Skills and Sources Of Predictabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, the spread shown in Figure 12 may be a consequence of the common primary feature of climate variability over the mid-high latitude lands, and even in the mid-high latitude oceans (Davis, 1976;Hu et al, 2011;, which are dominated by atmospheric internal variability and somewhat constrained by external and/or remote forcings, such as SST (Kosaka et al, 2012;He et al, 2016). In fact, model defaults and errors in ICs (or reanalyses) may also affect the prediction skill to some extent (Kumar and Hu, 2012;Zhu et al, 2013;Liang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Attributions Of Predictability Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%