2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016je005088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in planet formation

Abstract: Over the past two decades, large strides have been made in the field of planet formation. Yet fundamental questions remain. Here we review our state of understanding of five fundamental bottlenecks in planet formation. These are the following: (1) the structure and evolution of protoplanetary disks; (2) the growth of the first planetesimals; (3) orbital migration driven by interactions between protoplanets and gaseous disk; (4) the origin of the Solar System's orbital architecture; and (5) the relationship bet… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
127
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
(294 reference statements)
3
127
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results are in good agreement with the timing and sequence of events predicted in the core accretion model for the formation of Jupiter (1). One important implication of this result is that, because Jupiter acted as a barrier against inward transport of solids across the disk, the inner Solar System remained relatively mass deficient, possibly explaining its lack of any "super-Earths" (34,35).…”
Section: Growth History Of Jupitersupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, our results are in good agreement with the timing and sequence of events predicted in the core accretion model for the formation of Jupiter (1). One important implication of this result is that, because Jupiter acted as a barrier against inward transport of solids across the disk, the inner Solar System remained relatively mass deficient, possibly explaining its lack of any "super-Earths" (34,35).…”
Section: Growth History Of Jupitersupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These zero torque locations move radially inwards as the disc evolves over time (Lyra et al 2010). It can be seen from Bitsch et al (2015) and Morbidelli & Raymond (2016) that at late times in the evolution of a disc the zero torque boundary follows a curve where essentially the planet mass falls off with radial location, as seen in our observational results, though the slope of this boundary is yet to be analysed in detail and the simulations are limited to outer regions of the disc. Further study of other planet-disk processes including gap-opening and migration is needed to fully assess the importance of the disc phase.…”
Section: Zero-torque Locationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In this case, the lack of a substantial inner disk eliminates some of the proposed mechanisms involving accretion (Bouvier et al 2013) or vertical structures in a disk (Ansdell et al 2016b). Impact disruption of asteroidal bodies or giant impacts during the final phase of rocky planet formation (Morbidelli & Raymond 2016) have been invoked to explain warm dust around 30-50 Myr-old RZ Piscium, the 25 Myrold β Pictoris Moving Group member HD 172555 (Johnson et al 2012), and ID8, a star with a rapidly time-varying excess in the ∼35 Myr cluster NGC 2547 (Su et al 2019). Something analogous to these impact-driven disks might explain the excess infrared emission of 125 Myr-old HD 240779.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%