2021
DOI: 10.1155/2021/8870680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Patients with Trisomy 21: A Review of Current Knowledge and Recommendations

Abstract: Purpose. To summarize and review the common ophthalmic anomalies in children with trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) in order to propose an update to current clinical recommendations. Methods. A retrospective chart review, systemic literature review, and international survey of the frequency of ocular abnormalities, screening schedules, and challenging aspects examining children with trisomy 21. The chart review included patients treated at the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital of Zurich over a tw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of positive findings, the ophthalmologist should determine the examination frequency individually [35]. Recently, Robinson et al recommended first ophthalmological and orthoptic examination between 6 and 12 months of age, followed by examinations every 3-6 months for children under 2 years of age, every 6 months for children aged 2-5 years, annually for children 5-10 years of age, and, after that, to be decided on an individual basis [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of positive findings, the ophthalmologist should determine the examination frequency individually [35]. Recently, Robinson et al recommended first ophthalmological and orthoptic examination between 6 and 12 months of age, followed by examinations every 3-6 months for children under 2 years of age, every 6 months for children aged 2-5 years, annually for children 5-10 years of age, and, after that, to be decided on an individual basis [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%