2018
DOI: 10.3390/pr6090144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in Nanofluidics—Beyond Navier–Stokes at the Molecular Scale

Abstract: The fluid dynamics of macroscopic and microscopic systems is well developed and has been extensively validated. Its extraordinary success makes it tempting to apply Navier–Stokes fluid dynamics without modification to systems of ever decreasing dimensions as studies of nanofluidics become more prevalent. However, this can result in serious error. In this paper, we discuss several ways in which nanoconfined fluid flow differs from macroscopic flow. We give particular attention to several topics that have recent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A major roadblock in conducting a scientific investigation in the nanofluidic regime is that existing continuum models fail to elucidate the experimental observations. As nanochannels comprise fewer molecules, there can be excessive molecular fluctuations and the fluid properties can become inhomogeneous [17]. This is especially true when the length scale of the confinement is of the same order of magnitude as the molecular size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major roadblock in conducting a scientific investigation in the nanofluidic regime is that existing continuum models fail to elucidate the experimental observations. As nanochannels comprise fewer molecules, there can be excessive molecular fluctuations and the fluid properties can become inhomogeneous [17]. This is especially true when the length scale of the confinement is of the same order of magnitude as the molecular size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared with experimental methods, numerical simulations, such as the lattice Boltzmann method and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, are more attractive in many aspects. First, numerical simulations can readily reach the system sizes and timescales of practical nanoflows [43]. Additionally, numerical methods can provide a controllable way to change a certain property of liquid or solid walls while other properties remain unchanged [44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, numerical methods can provide a controllable way to change a certain property of liquid or solid walls while other properties remain unchanged [44]. In comparison with physical experiments, numerical simulations allow researchers to study the density, velocity profiles, and other properties with a high resolution [43]. Finally, when the flow systems are under extreme conditions, such as at high shear rates, it has also been proven that numerical simulations are more efficient than experimental methods [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting composition is now a material with improved effective properties such as conductivity and density [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Due to their adjustable physical and thermophysical properties, nanofluids are used in wide range of applications [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. The pertinency of these newly developed fluids in outspread industrial implications lure scientists to study nanofluids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%