Challenges in measuring interprofessional–interorganisational collaboration with a questionnaire

Abstract

BackgroundCollaboration between medical professionals from separate organisations is necessary to deliver good patient care. This care is influenced by professionals’ perceptions about their collaboration. Until now, no instrument to measure such perceptions was available in the Netherlands. A questionnaire developed and validated in Spain was translated to assess perceptions about clinicians’ collaboration in primary and secondary care in the Dutch setting.AimValidation in the Dutch setting of a Spanish questionnaire that aimed to assess perceptions of clinicians about interorganisational collaboration.Design & settingAfter translation, cultural adaptation, and pre-testing, the questionnaire was sent to GPs and secondary care clinicians (SCCs) in three regions in the Netherlands. The responses of 445 responders were used to assess the validity and reliability of the questionnaire.MethodA confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were performed to study the construct validity of the hypothesised factor model underlying the questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using weighted Kappa statistics.ResultsResults of the CFA indicated poor fit of the hypothesised factor structure. EFA, executed separately for each region, showed a highly unstable factor structure. The test-retest reliability analysis demonstrated low re-test reliability.ConclusionThe underlying factor structure of a Spanish questionnaire could not be reproduced. The construct validity and reliability of this questionnaire were insufficient to warrant use in the Dutch setting. This study demonstrates the need for evaluating validity and reliability of questionnaires in local settings.

Integrated Palliative Care for Nursing Home Residents: Exploring the Challenges in the Collaboration between Nursing Homes, Home Care and Hospitals

“…The adapted instrument of this case study can be used to examine inter-organisational collaboration in healthcare contexts other than palliative care and contexts other than the Belgian-Flemish community. In a recent study by Meijer et al [68] in the Netherlands the instrument developed by Nuño-Solínis et al [42] was also translated and adapted. These authors found the instrument to be inadequate in terms of validity and reliability and warn against its use in a different cultural setting, population, or context without testing it first.…”

The effects of positive leadership on quality of work and life of family doctors: The moderated role of culture

“…A questionnaire was exploited for this study using the following steps: first, measurement indicators including positive leadership, supportive resources, achievement motivation and QWL, were screened through a literature review; second, the indicators draw from the literature was translated to Chinese language. The indicator which needed to be translated mainly included the Positive Leadership scale ( Meijer et al, 2018 ), supportive resources scale ( Lukes and Stephan, 2017 ), Achievement Motivation Scale ( Smith et al, 2019 ). However, the initial indicators which were Chinese version in previous studies needed no translation, for instance, the Brooks QWL questionnaire ( Brooks and Anderson, 2004 ) and the General Self-Efficacy Scale ( Schwarzer et al, 1999 ).…”

“…The positive leadership scale was conducted to assess whether the leaders of healthcare institutions coordinated and motivated the development of family doctor services. We extracted the initial indicators from the literature, including a questionnaire about leadership designed by Meijer ( Meijer et al, 2018 ) and the findings of different leadership forms ( D’Innocenzo et al, 2016 ). We also distilled indicators through thematic analysis to optimize the indicators, with a total word frequency of 60.…”

“…The supportive supportive resources scale was conducted to estimate whether the human resources, funding and material resources of family doctor services are sufficient. We extracted the initial indicators from the literature, including the Innovation Support Scale (ISI) ( Lukes and Stephan, 2017 ) and the organizational environment framework validated by Meijer et al (2018) . We further optimized the indicators through thematic analysis, with a total word frequency of 129.…”

Transcending boundaries for collaborative patient care

“…We sampled participants from an earlier survey study (Meijer et al 2018) purposefully to collect the perspectives of both GPs and MSs. Nineteen professionals agreed to participate: six GPs and five MSs who contributed to CPCA construction as well as five GPs and three MSs not directly involved in their construction.…”