2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in measuring fracture toughness of dental ceramics: SEPB method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three methods for creating sharp cracks in beam specimens for determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics are introduced in ASTM C 1421 (ASTM, 2018), including the single‐edge pre‐cracked beam (SEPB) and the surface crack in flexure (SCF) methods. Using a bridge‐loading technique, the SEPB method extends precracks from either a shallow sawed notch or indentations (Jodha, Marocho, & Griggs, 2018; Quinn, Kübler, & Gettings, 1994). The geometry and residual deformation at the tip of the precrack influence the measurement, which should be treated with caution when calculating the fracture toughness value (Suresh, Ewart, Maden, Slaughter, & Nguyen, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three methods for creating sharp cracks in beam specimens for determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics are introduced in ASTM C 1421 (ASTM, 2018), including the single‐edge pre‐cracked beam (SEPB) and the surface crack in flexure (SCF) methods. Using a bridge‐loading technique, the SEPB method extends precracks from either a shallow sawed notch or indentations (Jodha, Marocho, & Griggs, 2018; Quinn, Kübler, & Gettings, 1994). The geometry and residual deformation at the tip of the precrack influence the measurement, which should be treated with caution when calculating the fracture toughness value (Suresh, Ewart, Maden, Slaughter, & Nguyen, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%