Challenges in laboratory diagnosis of Malaria in a low resource country among cases of acute febrile illness at tertiary care hospital in eastern Nepal: Comparative study on Conventional Vs Molecular approach

Abstract

Background For ongoing malaria elimination programme, available methods like microscopy and rapid diagnostic test (RDT) are not able to detect all the cases of malaria in acute febrile illness. These methods are entirely dependent on the course of infection, parasite load and skilled technical resources thus the study was carried out to compare performance of microscopy and RDT which are commonly used in a low resource country along with reference to real-time PCR. Methods Altogether 52 blood samples collected from patients with acute febrile illness were tested by microscopy, RDT and real-time PCR. The results were compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Results The test results were as follows: 5.8% positivity by Microscopy, 13.5% positivity by RDT and 27% by real time PCR. Taking into consideration of PCR as a gold standard method microscopy showed 21.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Likewise, RDT results revealed 28.6% sensitivity and 92.1% specificity. Conclusion Despite of various diagnostic tools available, microscopy stills remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and RDT is the user friendly to execute the test under the tree, but our preliminary results emphasized the need to implement the test with the higher sensitivity and specificity in context of malaria elimination programme which could be another important opportunity to understand the parasite circulation in case of low endemic region. However, these results should be further verified with the large study cohort in order to document the submicroscopic infection.

Challenges in Laboratory Diagnosis of Malaria in a Low-Resource Country at Tertiary Care in Eastern Nepal: A Comparative Study of Conventional vs. Molecular Methodologies

“…An early version of the preprint of this study has been previously published by Research Square [ 43 ].…”