2004
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504101101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in knowledge management education

Abstract: The members of panel will discuss the opportunities information professionals who are able to work closely and challenges facing knowledge management education.with the knowledge workers, understand their needs and The panel will share their experiences in the development communicate their concerns to the management of the of four knowledge management programs at Kent State organization. Knowledge professionals will help University, Dominican University, University of organizations identify opportunities, deal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second dimension, the literature review on the subject of knowledge management education, produced 62 published articles, chapters and communications. The most prominent of these are cited here (Al-Hawamdeh, 2003;Al-Hawamdeh, 2005;Al-Hawamdeh et al, 2004;Bartczak, 2010;Chaudhry and Higgins, 2001;Chaudhry and Higgins, 2003;Chen Chiu and Fan, 2002;Rehman and Sumait, 2010;Rehmann and Chaudhry, 2005;Ruth et al, 1999Ruth et al, , 2002Saito, 2007;Saito et al, 2004;Weidner, 2002). Bedford (2013) categorized the literature by its coverage of (1) the focus of the curriculum; (2) program administration; (3) program goals; (4) program research focus; and (5) faculty credentials and experiential credibility.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Educationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The second dimension, the literature review on the subject of knowledge management education, produced 62 published articles, chapters and communications. The most prominent of these are cited here (Al-Hawamdeh, 2003;Al-Hawamdeh, 2005;Al-Hawamdeh et al, 2004;Bartczak, 2010;Chaudhry and Higgins, 2001;Chaudhry and Higgins, 2003;Chen Chiu and Fan, 2002;Rehman and Sumait, 2010;Rehmann and Chaudhry, 2005;Ruth et al, 1999Ruth et al, , 2002Saito, 2007;Saito et al, 2004;Weidner, 2002). Bedford (2013) categorized the literature by its coverage of (1) the focus of the curriculum; (2) program administration; (3) program goals; (4) program research focus; and (5) faculty credentials and experiential credibility.…”
Section: Knowledge Management Educationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Traditionally, information professionals' roles were limited to the identification, acquisition and organization of explicit knowledge or information. Today, that role is being expanded to include other forms of knowledge activities‐ tacit and implicit knowledge in the form of skills and competencies (Al‐Hawamdeh, 2004). Managing the “tacit” intuitions and “know how” of organizational members or knowledge workers has become a great challenge for information professionals (Bishop, 2001; Maponya, 2004).…”
Section: Opportunities For Library Practitionersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an educational context, the professional literature has identified the major challenges in terms of the breadth of the KM concept, the multiplicity of its required competencies, and the identification and implementation of elements of KM into LIS curricula (Koenig 1999;Milne 1999;Hawamdeh et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, much of the emphasis within the literature has been on the interdisciplinary nature of KM and the issues of integrating different disciplines within programs, including resource implications, and the difficulty of finding staff who are both willing and able to teach KM (Hawamdeh 2005;Sutton 2007). While at the moment there is evidence of disparate approaches to KM in different departments, with provider perspectives a major determinant of curriculum content (Chaudhry and Higgins 2001;Hawamdeh et al 2004;Saito 2007), there are also signs (Loon and Hawamdeh 2002) that an interdisciplinary and integrative approach to KM education is likely to prove more fruitful. Achievement of such a goal will require the integration of different conceptual approaches, together with an acceptance that determining the appropriate level of involvement from associated disciplines, creating consensus among them and catering for such integration will be challenging issues for KM education (Loon and Hawamdeh 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%