Challenges in Italian wine routes: managing stakeholder networks

Abstract

Purpose -The aim of this article is to analyse how wine and tourism operators understand the concept of a wine route, in order to determine the impact that definition can have on the extent to which stakeholders working within distinct, but related sectors (namely wine production, tourism, food and hospitality) collaborate with each other and share knowledge.Design/methodology/approach -By adopting the theoretical lens of "boundary objects" (understood as tangible or intangible entities that allow the sharing of meaning to different groups and facilitate collaboration), this article uses a qualitative approach, based on semi-structured interviews of 20 informants working in three different wine routes in Italy. Analysis of data is carried out in order to highlight the similarities and differences between the wine and tourism (including identified associated service) industries.Findings -Wine routes can be considered boundary objects that, if clearly defined by local stakeholders, can facilitate knowledge sharing and collaboration. Problems in collaboration could be explained by an initial misdefinition by stakeholders of what a wine route and its remit are.Research limitations -Since the theoretical lens of "boundary objects" was applied for the first time to wine routes and tourism, further research is necessary in order to validate its application.Practical implications -It is suggested that managers of wine routes involve all stakeholders in discussions to achieve a common understanding on what a wine route is and its role in the promotion of "place" (geographical context of the wine route). Only if this is done successfully, is it possible to achieve collaboration.Originality/value of the paper -This article uses the concept of "boundary objects" (a concept traditionally applied to the study of innovation) to the analysis of wine routes, and provides further theoretical and managerial insights concerning networking between wine and tourism sectors, taking a supply-side perspective.

Opportunities and challenges in the contribution of wine routes to wine tourism in Italy – A stakeholders' perspective of development

“…Similarly, better performance is possible also for Italian wine tourism, which nowadays has not yet reached full development especially considering the full potential of the country (Tommasetti and Festa, 2014;Festa et al, 2015). Similar problems have arisen also for Wine Routes, most of all because frequently their governance, and the related engagement/responsibility, being normally a wide public/private collaboration, is not clear, or at least is not shared (Bregoli et al, 2016), even though this problem is common also for all the Wine Routes throughout the world (Kunc, 2010;Hassen and Tremblay, 2016).…”

Does social media usage affect online purchasing intention for wine? The moderating role of subjective and objective knowledge

“…Social media are important both for consumers and suppliers ( for a review on social media and local tourism, see Leung et al, 2013). Specifically, the use of social media may be very important in Italy where better Wine Routes (Bregoli et al, 2016) and initiatives such as Open Cellars (Colombini, 2015;Festa et al, 2017), which have the potential to attract both Italian and international tourists. A widespread and integrated use of social media by wineries and the several stakeholders involved, such as tour operators and hotels, could thus influence wine consumer behavior as well as enhance the broader local economy.…”

The balanced scorecard of a new destination product: Implications for lodging and skiing firms

“…These individuals were identified both based on meetings held and through the use of the snowball technique, whereby the participants were asked to recommend other potential participants, a common technique in previous papers developed in the field of a destination (i.e. Bregoli et al, 2016). The number of actors is in line with other studies (i.e.…”