2011
DOI: 10.1183/09059180.00001711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis trials: the point on end-points

Abstract: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias and is associated with both a variable clinical course and a poor prognosis. Investigators involved in clinical trials and clinicians reviewing the IPF literature are confronted with daunting challenges in selecting reliable outcome measures, interpreting the clinical and statistical importance of these findings, and applying this knowledge to the clinical care of their patients. In order to evaluate the efficacy o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…80 Few studies have used PFS and different studies appear to use different composite end points. Caution is, therefore, required in their interpretation.…”
Section: Progression-free Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…80 Few studies have used PFS and different studies appear to use different composite end points. Caution is, therefore, required in their interpretation.…”
Section: Progression-free Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPF NMA focused on the FVC end point as clinical evidence has established a correlation with disease progression 80 and, thus, FVC drives the economic model (discussed in Chapter 4, Independent economic evaluation). Ten studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis ( Table 54).…”
Section: Network Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The challenges inherent in finding completely effective agents have been addressed in a number of recent reviews [9][10][11][12][13]. Part of the problem is disagreement about how to judge drug efficacy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%