Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2022
DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2022.2122226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in gaining ethical approval for sensitive digital social science studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of the reviewed papers, 66% had no disclosure of ethical review, a figure close to what Winter and Gundur [107] find (72.5%) in their review of criminological studies with digital methodologies. There seemed to be an observable pattern between the design of the study and whether ethical approval had been obtained (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Out of the reviewed papers, 66% had no disclosure of ethical review, a figure close to what Winter and Gundur [107] find (72.5%) in their review of criminological studies with digital methodologies. There seemed to be an observable pattern between the design of the study and whether ethical approval had been obtained (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Stringent ethical considerations regarding participant welfare were diligently observed throughout this study as Winter and Gundur (2022) have pointed out. These measures included obtaining informed consent, ensuring confidentiality and anonymity, and safeguarding the well-being and privacy of the participants.…”
Section: Ethical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%