Challenges in food waste recycling in high-rise buildings and public design for sustainability: A case in Hong Kong

Abstract

A B S T R A C TIn recent decades, various studies on policy, management, behaviour, norms and economic incentives related to food waste issues have been conducted. Many of the studies are from a quantitative perspective which has given a wider but general coverage of study and analysis on the matters. However, the impacts of context, such as living environments and social culture, on recycling activities from a qualitative as well as in-depth perspective have seldom been discussed, especially in densely populated communities. Taking Hong Kong as an example, some food waste recycling (FWR) initiatives have been launched in housing estates. However, most projects have been suspended due to many practical problems. Only a few cases are still on-going. Physical setting quality has been identified as a significant factor affecting sustainable behaviour. Inefficient and low-quality public designs that do not consider living environments and specific lifestyles may fail to encourage community participation. This study aims to provide a more in-depth investigation into people's attitudes and actual behaviour towards and to shed light on public design for sustainability. Using the FWR programme in Amoy Gardens as a case, this study uses qualitative research methods to explore FWR experiences and improve its weaknesses. The findings show three potential challenges to FWR in densely populated high-rise buildings: (1) limited space, (2) hygiene issues and (3) implementation and management. This study also provides implications for public design to improve sustainability in communities and encourage public participation in FWR in high-density residential areas.

The Sustainability Pyramid: A Hierarchical Approach to Greater Sustainability and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals With Implications for Marketing Theory, Practice, and Public Policy

“…However, the problem for economic sustainability is that most marketers have failed to show how consumers would benefit by consuming sustainably, whether in terms of choosing greener alternatives or simply rejecting consumption, and thus, it becomes obvious why consumers have not bought into the idea of sustainability. This is especially evident in light of consumer complaints that green products are often more expensive, poorer in quality, and do not function as well as nongreen products (Lim et al, 2013) and that rejection of consumption creates sacrifices that make living difficult (Hutter & Hoffmann, 2013;Xiao & Siu, 2018). Showing the economic value of sustainable alternatives for consumption should lead to widespread adoption and adaptation of sustainable consumption practices, thereby contributing to reducing consumption of unsustainable alternatives, and thus, improving the conditions of the people (social) and the planet (environment).…”

Restructuring municipal solid waste management and governance in Hong Kong: Options and prospects

“…Regarding the driving force of MSWM and governance, Marshall and Farahbakhsh’s (2013) study asserted five principal factors: (a) public health – sanitary revolution; (b) environmental movement on public and political agenda; (c) resource scarcity and the value of waste; (d) climate change; and (e) public awareness and participation – “not in my backyard”, sustainable and pro-environmental behavioural change. In practice, studies from Fok (2016: 16) and Xiao and Siu (2018: 178) identified convenience consideration, availability of physical infrastructure, technical facilities, and public facilities, as well as on-site implementation and management as contextual factors which are highly correlated with sustainable and pro-environmental behavioural change in MSWM. In respect of the physical infrastructure, technical facilities and availability of public facilities, some scholars have addressed some connected factors, including: the perceived needs for the facilities concerned; the perceived impacts and risks; the perceived fairness of the process; and the public’s trust in those who make decisions (Fabian and Lou, 2019; Lam and Woo, 2009).…”

Food waste generation in a university and the handling efficiency of a university catering facility-scale automatic collection system

“…There are potential challenges to food waste recycling in densely populated high-rise buildings (Xiao and Siu, 2018). Hong Kong is facing difficulties in collecting food waste effectively through the manual approach despite efforts to promote food waste reduction and recycling (Mak et al, 2018).…”