Challenges in Determining Body Fat in Pregnant Women

Abstract

Background/Aims: Determining body composition in pregnant women is challenging as not all of the existing applicable methodologies can be used during pregnancy and not all of the methods have been properly standardized. The aim of this study was to compare the existing anthropometric methods for the evaluation of body composition, especially in pregnant women. Methods: One hundred forty-seven pregnant volunteers aged [average (SD)] 31 years (±4) in gestational week 32 (±3) provided information on their age and prepregnancy body mass. Their height, current mass, skinfold thicknesses, and limb circumferences were measured. The body density and fat percentage were calculated according to 17 different anthropometric equations obtained from the literature. Data were analyzed with ANOVA. Results: For the same sample of pregnant women, the body fat percentages obtained using the existing anthropometric methods varied greatly (p < 0.0001) and ranged from 16% (±5) to 38% (±4); methods developed specifically for pregnant women yielded disturbingly large differences, with body fat values ranging from 16% (±5) to 36% (±6). Conclusions: This study revealed large discrepancies among anthropometric methods for body composition assessment in pregnant women. As the results from the same sample obtained with different existing equations are wide ranging, the existing methodologies should be examined and improved before they can serve as sources of information regarding the health status of pregnant women.

Pilot Study Examining Pregnancy-specific Equations to Estimate Percent Body Fat in an Overweight/obese Pregnant Hispanic Population

“…These study results point to using the Presley equation for estimating %BF as the Paxton equation significantly overestimated %BF in this study's overweight or obese, pregnant population. The tendency of the Paxton equation to yield higher %BF estimates is consistent with Robič et al's findings (Robič et al, 2014).…”

A 12-Week Exercise Program for Pregnant Women with Obesity to Improve Physical Activity Levels: An Open Randomised Preliminary Study

“…However, our trial was pragmatic and objective measurements such as accelerometry and fitness data are less prone to be affected by the support given to participants or by a desirability bias. Fat percentage estimates were based on widely used equations although not validated during pregnancy, as no consensus exists on which anthropometric method should be used to reliably determine body composition during pregnancy [ 47 ]. Because it was not possible to have skinfold measures at 36 weeks made by the same assessor as for the first two visits and to avoid high inter-observer variability [ 48 ], this assessment was not performed.…”

Predictive and diagnostic biomarkers for gestational diabetes and its associated metabolic and cardiovascular diseases

“…Importantly, obesity can trigger GDM development. Although body mass index (BMI) is not appropriately descriptive for obesity during pregnancy, this anthropomorphic parameter was linked to GDM occurrence [40]. Adipose tissue and placenta can produce a similar pattern of cytokines, which explains the fact that obese women are at higher risk of GDM [41].…”