2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in dealing with walking speed in knee osteoarthritis gait analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, reduced velocity appears inherently linked to disease progression, and can as such be regarded to be an intrinsic key feature of hip OA gait. Thus, it is not straightforward to consider velocity solely as a “disturbing” variable, that should be controlled for in a regular analysis of variance, leaving the unadjusted analyses out [26]. From a clinical perspective, controlling for velocity can give diminutive meaning; as it is inapplicable to just tell the patients to walk faster in order to reduce their joint moments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, reduced velocity appears inherently linked to disease progression, and can as such be regarded to be an intrinsic key feature of hip OA gait. Thus, it is not straightforward to consider velocity solely as a “disturbing” variable, that should be controlled for in a regular analysis of variance, leaving the unadjusted analyses out [26]. From a clinical perspective, controlling for velocity can give diminutive meaning; as it is inapplicable to just tell the patients to walk faster in order to reduce their joint moments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including seven articles; a total of 46 different biomechanical variables were reported. This illustrates the lack of a clear consensus on which specific gait parameters should be regarded as being of most relevance for patients with hip OA [19,25,26]. Consequently, the role of gait biomechanics in hip OA initiation and progression is not fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We discovered a significantly greater ratio of men to women in our symptomatic group compared to asymptomatic, and proceeded to use sex‐adjusted analysis of variance to compare biomechanical and muscle activation variables between groups differences because we have previously reported biomechanical differences during gait between men and women . The walking velocity difference between groups was approximately 5%, and although we are aware that walking velocity and joint level mechanics can be related (e.g., Landry et al [2007]), reduced walking speed is an integrated effect of OA symptoms and controlling walking speed using an ANCOVA model would not be appropriate as this effect is not simply an erroneous sampling issue such as the difference in sex distribution between the groups …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Thus we used speed as a covariate to ensure that differences we observed in the walking variables were due to differences in the subjects rather than differences in walking speed. None-the-less, using speed as a covariate may have removed portions of the main effect or group from the analysis (Wilson, 2012). Finally, when examining movement compensation strategies it is important to examine all the joints involved, such as the ankle, knee and hip during walking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%