2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2007.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges in coupled thermal–hydraulics and neutronics simulations for LWR safety analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown before in previous studies 89 Figure 9A-C shows the convergence of the neutronic and thermal-hydraulic parameters for few coupling iterations. TRACE is executed first with uniform axial power in all nodes.…”
Section: Application 2: Multiphysics Couplingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It was shown before in previous studies 89 Figure 9A-C shows the convergence of the neutronic and thermal-hydraulic parameters for few coupling iterations. TRACE is executed first with uniform axial power in all nodes.…”
Section: Application 2: Multiphysics Couplingsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Some codes utilizes the methodologies for point kinetics model such that several parallel coolant channel and corresponding fuel rod models describing the parts of the reactor core in such a way as to utilizes the boundary conditions at the core inlet and outlet supplied by the system code .This method can be expanded to full 3D model and coupled to thermal hydraulic model and heat structure model in the core region. [5] Figure. The coupling between thermal hydraulic and neutronics can be performed in two ways i.e internal and external with advantages and deficiencies are lied upon.…”
Section: Neutronic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verification of this coupled technique was done by Jackson et al . for the core transient analysis .ATHLETE code coupled with 3D core neutronic model DYN3D has been used for the analysis of BWR Turbine trip benchmark, and the validation of this code for PWR and BWR was done by Glaeser .Similarly, the code like ATHLET‐QUABOX/CUBBOX has been used by Langenbuch for the analysis of OECD/NRC BWR Turbine trip benchmark .RELAP code has been coupled with point kinetic codes for the analysis of OECD/NEA PWR MSLB by Sanchez‐Espanioza and Nigro et al . .CATHORE code has been coupled with CRONOS2‐FLICA4 for BWR turbine trip analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%