2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges for ΛCDM: An update

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
72
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 1,533 publications
2
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature of dark energy can be characterized by its equation of state (EOS) w. The simplest candidate of dark energy is the cosmological constant Λ, whose EOS is w = −1. The cosmological constant dark energy plus the cold dark matter make up the ΛCDM cosmological model, and the wCDM model is obtained if the EOS of dark energy is generalized from −1 to an arbitrary constant w. The simple ΛCDM model fits with observations (eBOSS Collaboration 2021) very well on one hand; however, on the other hand, it is plagued by the Hubble constant (H 0 ) tension (Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2021;Valentino et al 2021). Based on the ΛCDM model, the high-redshift CMB radiation data (Planck Collaboration 2020) give a tight constraint on H 0 (67.4 ± 0.5 km s −1 Mpc −1 ), which deviates from H 0 = 73.2 ± 1.3 km s −1 Mpc −1 given by the low-redshift SN Ia data (Riess et al 2018a(Riess et al , 2018b(Riess et al , 2021 more than 4σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of dark energy can be characterized by its equation of state (EOS) w. The simplest candidate of dark energy is the cosmological constant Λ, whose EOS is w = −1. The cosmological constant dark energy plus the cold dark matter make up the ΛCDM cosmological model, and the wCDM model is obtained if the EOS of dark energy is generalized from −1 to an arbitrary constant w. The simple ΛCDM model fits with observations (eBOSS Collaboration 2021) very well on one hand; however, on the other hand, it is plagued by the Hubble constant (H 0 ) tension (Perivolaropoulos & Skara 2021;Valentino et al 2021). Based on the ΛCDM model, the high-redshift CMB radiation data (Planck Collaboration 2020) give a tight constraint on H 0 (67.4 ± 0.5 km s −1 Mpc −1 ), which deviates from H 0 = 73.2 ± 1.3 km s −1 Mpc −1 given by the low-redshift SN Ia data (Riess et al 2018a(Riess et al , 2018b(Riess et al , 2021 more than 4σ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another type of measurement is provided by the Planck collaboration, which uses temperature and polarization anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) to obtain H 0 = 67.27±0.6 km s −1 Mpc −1 . The discrepancy between local modelindependent measurements of H 0 and the early Universe CMB values can reach 5.3σ and it is one of the fundamental problems in cosmology ( Schöneberg et al (2019); Di Valentino (2017); Di Valentino et al (2021b,a); Perivolaropoulos & Skara (2022); Lucca (2021); Verde et al (2019); Knox & Millea (2020); Jedamzik et al (2021); Shah et al (2021); Abdalla et al (2022)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of theoretical predictions and observations requires LSS data as well, all the more if we take into account that the σ8-tension stems from it. Allowing for some evolution of the vacuum can be the clue to alleviate such a tension [68,70,72], as vacuum dynamics affects nontrivially the cosmological perturbations [142,143]. We consider the perturbed, spatially flat, FLRW metric ds2=dt2+false(δij+hijfalse) dxidxj, in which hij stands for the metric fluctuations.…”
Section: Some Phenomenological Applications For the Current Universementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the χH2 part may contain or not the local H0 value measured by Riess et al [77]. The local determination of H0 (which is around 4σ away from the corresponding Planck 2018 value based on the CMB) is the origin of the so-called H0 tension [7072]. Taking into account that the type I and II RRVM’s have one and two more parameters, respectively, when compared with the normalΛCDM, a fairer model comparison is achieved by computing the numerical differences between the deviance information criterion (DIC) of the normalΛCDM model against the RRVM’s: normalΔDIC=DICnormalΛCDMDICRRVM.…”
Section: Some Phenomenological Applications For the Current Universementioning
confidence: 99%