2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39188-0_61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges for Inclusive Affective Detection in Educational Scenarios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, data mining techniques are to be used to process and combine this affective labeling from face expressions and body movements with breath and heart rate measures, body temperature levels, galvanic skin response, keyboard and mouse interaction, and the data from the participants' emotional self-reports. The purpose here is to take into account the needs of all users, including those with disabilities [ 50 ]. Taking all this into account, the main objective of our research within the MAMIPEC project is to facilitate an affective support that allows learners to perform cognitive tasks by improving their emotional control strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, data mining techniques are to be used to process and combine this affective labeling from face expressions and body movements with breath and heart rate measures, body temperature levels, galvanic skin response, keyboard and mouse interaction, and the data from the participants' emotional self-reports. The purpose here is to take into account the needs of all users, including those with disabilities [ 50 ]. Taking all this into account, the main objective of our research within the MAMIPEC project is to facilitate an affective support that allows learners to perform cognitive tasks by improving their emotional control strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, collaborative scenarios provide information about cognitive process and strategies specifically involved in social contexts, which deserve a different analysis [ 49 ]. Furthermore, it can be mentioned that participants with disability were also involved in the experience [ 50 ] but this analysis also deserves future work since there are differences in the variables to be considered when people have disabilities (e.g., there might be morphological or functional alterations that imply that their facial expressions and/or body movements vary in terms of intensity, location, or duration; users of screen readers use the keyboard for browsing interactions, not just typing). All these experiments took place in the so-called Madrid Science Week ( https://adenu.ia.uned.es/web/es/Proyectos/SemanaCiencia (in Spanish)).…”
Section: Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, self-directed learning acknowledges the importance of students' responsibility in their learning process. It is important to consider the flexibility needed in learning environments that are turned into inclusive spaces, as well as how technology is used to detect students' needs and preferences (Santos et al, 2013). We highlight this personal responsibility to the flexibility explained above, as a significant contribution to planning for teaching and learning processes that generate an impact on how courses are designed, considering all necessary adjustments from the design stage.…”
Section: Accessible and Inclusive Learning Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the System Usability Scale (SUS) [ 64 ] was also used to gather participants' perception on the CLF usability. Except for the SUS, the infrastructure prepared is similar to the one used in a related individual activity also carried out at the 2012 MSW [ 65 ].…”
Section: Formative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%