2011
DOI: 10.1021/jz2012325
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and Prospects of Electronic Doping of Colloidal Quantum Dots: Case Study of CdSe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several decades ago Turnbull proposed that very small crystals will tend to contain fewer defects compared with large ones. The concept of self‐purification has been studied for CQDs and has been proposed as a mechanism, which relies on the consideration of thermodynamic factors (energetics), to account for the difficulties met early on in the incorporation of dopants into CQDs for certain systems, such as doping CdSe CQDs with manganese . Later works, however, showed that the dopant‐incorporation efficiency for several dopant:CQD systems, for example Mn:CdSe and In:ZnO, is substantially controlled by kinetics and related factors such as the reactivity of the dopant precursor relative to the reactivity of the host crystal precursors or the dopant′s affinity over the various surface facets of the CQD.…”
Section: Challenges In Doping Cqdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several decades ago Turnbull proposed that very small crystals will tend to contain fewer defects compared with large ones. The concept of self‐purification has been studied for CQDs and has been proposed as a mechanism, which relies on the consideration of thermodynamic factors (energetics), to account for the difficulties met early on in the incorporation of dopants into CQDs for certain systems, such as doping CdSe CQDs with manganese . Later works, however, showed that the dopant‐incorporation efficiency for several dopant:CQD systems, for example Mn:CdSe and In:ZnO, is substantially controlled by kinetics and related factors such as the reactivity of the dopant precursor relative to the reactivity of the host crystal precursors or the dopant′s affinity over the various surface facets of the CQD.…”
Section: Challenges In Doping Cqdsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electrode and the concentration of dopant, which could result in enhanced electrical and optical properties. [21][22][23] These properties can be enhanced by doping Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ , and Co 2+ to QDs. [24] Of key PbS/TiO 2 photo-anode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Electrically active doping in QDs can also further engender the host QDs with new functional-material properties, thereby improving the electrical/optical properties of colloidal QD (CQD) solids. [4][5][6][7][8][9] Unfortunately, to date, in situ incorporation of dopants during CQD synthesis has been difficult within the nanosize regime. The incorporation of impurity atoms into the interiors of fewnanometer-sized QD host materials is unfavorable owing to several factors: [5,10,11] (i) the dopant solubility limit is often exceeded in the small volume of a QD; (ii) dopants can be ejected from the QD lattice through a thermodynamically controlled self-purification mechanism; and (iii) Coulombic repulsion between charged impurity ions push them towards the QD surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%