2014
DOI: 10.1080/00987913.2014.949373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and Opportunities of Open Access: A Panel Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Therefore, the present authors recommend that librarians remain cognizant of these liabilities, but they agree with the conclusion of Smith that librarians should stress to users that OA and traditional journals deserve equal consideration when making decisions concerning quality. 35 Beall's Criteria serves an important purpose as a tool for information literacy and evaluation. However, since Beall ties it directly to his predatory journal and publishers lists, the Criteria becomes counterproductive to the two objectives of information literacy and evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 Therefore, the present authors recommend that librarians remain cognizant of these liabilities, but they agree with the conclusion of Smith that librarians should stress to users that OA and traditional journals deserve equal consideration when making decisions concerning quality. 35 Beall's Criteria serves an important purpose as a tool for information literacy and evaluation. However, since Beall ties it directly to his predatory journal and publishers lists, the Criteria becomes counterproductive to the two objectives of information literacy and evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%