Challenges and Opportunities for Purchasing High-Quality Health Care: Lessons from Armenia

Abstract

This paper examines how purchasing decisions in Armenia may contribute to barriers in using highquality health care, particularly for non-communicable diseases, drawing on a review of the literature and key informant interviews. The paper adapts the strategic health purchasing progress framework, to examine how characteristics of purchasing, the health system, and the political, administrative, and macro-fiscal environment may have facilitated or hindered the attainment of service delivery goals. We conclude with six lessons for reforms aimed at improving the coverage and quality of health care in Armenia. First, increasing the political priority of access to quality of health care is a pre-requisite to advancing reforms to address these issues. Second, improved purchasing governance in Armenia will require a purchaser that can make decisions without political interference, with appropriate accountability mechanisms, improvements in technical capacity, and the routine use of data systems. Third, there is a need for the regulatory framework to ensure that revisions of the benefits package contribute to reducing the disease burden and improving access to care. Fourth, regulations governing quality-related criteria for provider selection should be enforced and include considerations for process quality. Fifth, payment incentives should be revised to encourage an increase in the supply of primary health care, reduce bypassing for hospital care, and improve the quality of services. Sixth, the potential of purchasing to improve service delivery will be dependent on increased pre-paid and pooled funds and better governance of the quality of care.

Adjustments in purchasing arrangements to support the COVID-19 health sector response: evidence from eight middle-income countries

“…the outputs (summary country reports) produced by the Collectivity country teams. These are summary country reports, five out of these being published for Cameroon, Ghana (focusing on procurement), Philippines, Ukraine, Armenia and Romania ( Wee-Co et al ., 2021 ; Adin-Darko et al ., 2022 ; Chukwuma et al ., 2022 ; Doroshenko et al ., 2022 ; Nkangu et al ., 2022 ), a more detailed publication on Armenia and Romania ( Chukwuma et al ., 2023 ), whereas we used the non-published reports on Ghana ( Abuosi and Nketiah-Amponsah, 2022 ), Kenya ( Njoka et al ., 2022 ) and Nigeria ( Ayomoh et al ., 2022 ). We triangulated this information during consultations with the country teams.…”

From Universal Health Coverage services packages to budget appropriation: the long journey to implementation

“…In Armenia, EPHS has taken a ‘pyramid’ shape with the poor getting a larger publicly financed package and the well-off co-paying complementary private health insurance. 7 In Indonesia, contributions are collected from the well-off in exchange for better hoteling amenities and greater provider choice. 8 In Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Brazil, publicly financed EPHS are universal, although the well-off self-select to use private care.…”

Lung cancer screening beliefs in Armenia

“…Primary and secondary non-communicable disease (NCD) prevention should be a priority for Armenia, where 93% of deaths are attributable to NCDs ( 9 ). Tobacco cessation is one of the most cost-effective interventions to combat NCDs, including lung cancer ( 10 , 11 ).…”