2004
DOI: 10.3139/146.017951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and interesting observations associated with feedback-controlled nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As has been shown previously, the displacementcontrol mode tends to be more sensitive to discrete events 10 as indicated by the clear load drops in Fig. 3(a).…”
Section: B In Situ Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…As has been shown previously, the displacementcontrol mode tends to be more sensitive to discrete events 10 as indicated by the clear load drops in Fig. 3(a).…”
Section: B In Situ Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…A discussion on the stiffness, the instrumental assembly, and different deformation modes of the nanoindenter used in this study is presented in detail in Ref. [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the sample and machine as two serial springs, where the axial transducer stiffness is ∼10 2 N/m, and the sample has an axial stiffness of ∼11 000 N/m, it is clear that the dominant contribution to the apparent stiffness for the strain-driven data originates from the much more compliant transducer. The effective F − S slope in strain-driven deformation amounts to ∼1700 N/m, which only can be understood when considering the efficient and fast (78 kHz) feedback loop of the device, artificially stiffening the system [29]. For stress-driven testing the assumption of two springs in series does not apply.…”
Section: Model Assumptions and Experimental Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Pop-in, alternatively referred to as the yield point, marks the onset of plasticity in defectfree crystals [17][18][19]. For load controlled experiments, pop-in appears as rapid displacement increase whereas its incidence under displacement control is evident as a load drop [20].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%