2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and gaps with user-led decision-making for prioritizing maintenance work orders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, scientific and empirical evidence of maintenance priority areas and digitalisation steps are needed to support decision-making in the early stages of BIM and IoT-aided FM implementation (Codinhoto et al, 2021;Ensafi et al, 2023;Lewis, 2012). Therefore, the following research question was formulated to address this gap in practice and scientific knowledge:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, scientific and empirical evidence of maintenance priority areas and digitalisation steps are needed to support decision-making in the early stages of BIM and IoT-aided FM implementation (Codinhoto et al, 2021;Ensafi et al, 2023;Lewis, 2012). Therefore, the following research question was formulated to address this gap in practice and scientific knowledge:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reporting involves the communication of the fault or issue by an end-user or staff member to the FM sector. The work request (WR) is the physical or digital document used to describe the work required, thus identifying, for instance, the Statistical critical reactive maintenance faulty item, the job number, the work requested and the priority level (Ensafi et al, 2023;Gober, 2008;Gunay et al, 2018;M arquez, 2007). Once FM staff approves the request, the service is scheduled and allocated to the maintenance staff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations