2017
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges and future of biomarker tests in the era of precision oncology: Can we rely on immunohistochemistry (IHC) or fluorescencein situhybridization (FISH) to select the optimal patients for matched therapy?

Abstract: Molecular techniques have improved our understanding of the pathogenesis of cancer development. These techniques have also fueled the rational development of targeted drugs for patient populations stratified by their genetic characteristics. These novel methods have changed the classic paradigm of diagnostic pathology; among them are IHC, FISH, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microarray technology. IHC and FISH detection methods for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2), epidermal growth factor r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 240 publications
(203 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several molecules targeting the MET/HGF signaling have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies [against either HGF (Rilotumumab), or MET (Onartuzumab)] and MET small kinase inhibitors (Foretinib). These inhibitors were evaluated in clinical trials as target therapies for metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer[ 157 ]. Unfortunately, negative results were obtained in several phases II and III clinical trials due to a higher rate of serious toxicities or an increase in the number of deaths[ 158 ].…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Molecular Gc Classification: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several molecules targeting the MET/HGF signaling have been developed, including monoclonal antibodies [against either HGF (Rilotumumab), or MET (Onartuzumab)] and MET small kinase inhibitors (Foretinib). These inhibitors were evaluated in clinical trials as target therapies for metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer[ 157 ]. Unfortunately, negative results were obtained in several phases II and III clinical trials due to a higher rate of serious toxicities or an increase in the number of deaths[ 158 ].…”
Section: Clinical Implications Of Molecular Gc Classification: Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) and programmed cell‐death 1‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1) are transmembrane proteins that are important examples of proteins mediating such interactions. PD‐1 is expressed on the surface of B‐cells, T‐cells, and myeloid cells and functions as a checkpoint protein that is responsible for downregulating the immune system to protect the host from autoreactive T‐cells . Furthermore, the binding of PD‐1 to PD‐L1 in normal cells inhibits TCR‐mediated activation of interleukin (IL‐2) production and T‐cell proliferation to effectively prevent autoimmune disease.…”
Section: Emerging Prognostic Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, MAP DNA can be identified especially by PCR. Thus far, novel laboratory techniques (Chae et al, 2017) Southern Blot hybridization, Immunohistochemistry (IHC), introduced by Coons (Coons et al, 1941) in 1941, In-situ hybridization (ISH), described in the year 1969 by Joseph G. Gall (Gall et al, 1969) Fidleret al, 1994;Hulten et al, 2001;Ryan et al, 2002;Bull et al, 2003;Autschbach et al, 2005;Sechi et al, 2005;Romero et al, 2005;Szkaradkiewicz et al, 2007;Kirkwood et al, 2009;Mendoza et al, 2010;Tuci et al, 2011;Lee et al, 2011;Nazareth et al, 2015;Timms et al, 2016;Khan et al, 2016;Zamani et al, 2017) analyzed, are presented by the …”
Section: The Data Of the Studies Analyzedmentioning
confidence: 99%