Challenges and Concerns in Capture Fisheries and Aquaculture

Chuenpagdee, Ratana; Degnbol, Poul; Bavinck, Maarten; Jentoft, Svein; Johnson, Derek; Pullin, R.S.V.; Williams, S. B.

doi:10.1017/9789048505326.003

Cited by 23 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). In their deliberation about these four main concerns, the authors do not make a point of distinguishing between large-and small-scale fisheries.…”

Section: Key Concerns Affecting Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). They are all related to issues and challenges found in many fisheries around the world, such as unsustainable resource exploitation, poor recognition of fishing rights, poverty, lack of alternative employment and distortion in markets and supply chains (Jentoft and Eide, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Routledge Handbook of Ocean Resources and Management

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This comprehensive handbook provides a global overview of ocean resources and management by focusing on critical issues relating to human development and the marine environment, their interrelationships as expressed through the uses of the sea as a resource, and the regional expression of these themes. The underlying approach is geographical, with prominence given to the biosphere, political arrangements and regional patterns -all considered to be especially crucial to the human understanding required for the use and management of the world's oceans.Part 1 addresses key themes in our knowledge of relationships between people and the sea on a global scale, including economic and political issues, and understanding and managing marine environments. Part 2 provides a systematic review of the uses of the sea, grouped into food, ocean space, materials and energy, and the sea as an environmental resource. Part 3 on the geography of the sea considers management strategies especially related to the state system, and regional management developments in both core economic regions and the developing periphery. The primary themes within each chapter are governance (including institutional and legal bases); policy -sets of ideas governing management; and management, both technical and general.

show abstract

Section: Key Concerns Affecting Small-scale Fisheriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Four key concerns have been identified in fisheries governance, namely, ecosystem health, social justice, livelihoods and food security (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Bavinck et al, 2013). They are all related to issues and challenges found in many fisheries around the world, such as unsustainable resource exploitation, poor recognition of fishing rights, poverty, lack of alternative employment and distortion in markets and supply chains (Jentoft and Eide, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Routledge Handbook of Ocean Resources and Management

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the current climate of severe overexploitation and decline of many fish stocks, fleet overcapacity and widespread concern about degradation of aquatic ecosystems and inappropriate fisheries management regimes (Kooiman and Bavinck, 2005; Worm et al , 2006; FAO, 2010; Pierce et al , 2011), fishery governance faces the challenge to resolve the conflicts that result from seeking to simultaneously pursue the goals of maintaining a healthy ecosystem whilst continuing to derive social and economic benefits from fisheries (Thorpe et al , 2005). To add to this, fishery governance needs to address issues associated with (or affected by) globalisation such as ecosystem health, social justice, livelihood, and food security and safety (Chuenpagdee et al , 2005). Thus, as pointed out by Jentoft (2005), fisheries governance is a never‐ending process that requires robust and flexible institutions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Participatory issues in fisheries governance in Europe

Pita

Chuenpagdee

Pierce

2012

Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to describe the fisheries governance system in the European Union (EU) and review fishers’ participation in the decision‐making process in the EU.Design/methodology/approachThe study was based on a variety of sources, such as review of the literature, including scientific articles and reports, and data collected by the Coastal Transects Analysis Model (CTAM) online decision support tool.FindingsThe review reveals major improvements in involving fishers in the decision‐making process in Europe, but participation and empowerment are still generally lacking.Social implicationsThe lack of fisher participation in the decision‐making process leads to limited acceptance of management measures which in turn results in management objectives not being met, with negative effects on environmental, economic and social sustainability.Originality/valueThe paper provides a review of participation in the EU decision‐making process. The results could give management bodies an insight into the failures of participation and point to possible ways forward.

show abstract

“…Interactions are horizontal (Kooiman, 2003; and vertical (Berkes, 2009). Diverse sources of knowledge are recognized (Berkes, 2009), including social and natural sciences, as well as local and indigenous knowledge (Chuenpagdee et al, 2005;Hurley & Manel, 2015). Co-management is a recognized and influential form of co-governance and thus is included in this analysis.…”

Section: Analytical Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The reported outcomes of governance modes supported the analysis on performance. The approach suggested by Chuenpagdee et al (2005) was used to expand the focus of performance on commercial target species and account for ecosystems (e.g., associated species and habitats), social (e.g., food security) and governance outcomes (e.g., distribution of benefits, power distribution, the protection of the vulnerable). These dimensions were identified in existing literature for the analysis of performance.…”

Section: The Shadow Of Hierarchy In Marine Fisheries Governancementioning

confidence: 99%

The shadow of hierarchy in marine fisheries governance

Espinosa-Romero¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechani-Living the PhD was an exciting life and learning experience. I am very grateful to all my companions who supported me in this process.Juan Carlos Seijo, it was a privilege to have you as my promoter and to cross our paths again; your academic and fisheries expertise contributed significantly to this thesis and my development as a researcher. I always felt inspired and confident to continue my research after our meetings. Julieta Marotta, many thanks for your kind support in all aspects of the PhD, from research questions, to methods, to the concerns and challenges a PhD student goes through. I enjoyed and learned from our time together; and I was always inspired to see you balancing life, academic work, and relationships with a smile. Michal Natorski, many thanks for our theoretical discussions, all the information you shared with me, and the collaborative writing we did for our chapter. They challenged and sharpened my thinking and academic skills.Joop de Kraker, Liesbeth Lijnzaad, Maarten Bavinck, and Rashid Sumaila, many thanks for being the members of the assessment committee. Your contributions strengthened the final version of this research.To all the staff at Maastricht School of Governance and UNU-Merit, thank you so much for your support and patience over these years. Mindel Van de Laar, many thanks for your guidance, openness, and straightforwardness; they were always timely and helpful to navigate the PhD process. To the GPAC coordination team, especially Shivani Achrekar, Charlotte Mueller, Cristina Mancigottti, and Paris Cosma, many thanks for helping us, GPAC students, with all the logistics during our visits to Maastricht. Your support and smiles make our PhD journey smoother and nicer. It was great to meet you all.viii Ale, Paulina, Ivana, Renata, Nikito, Mayú, and Mamatina, many thanks for the care, warmth, and laughs you always bring to my life. Víctor Fernández and Sander Jobse, many thanks for letting me stay at your places on my layovers in Amsterdam and London. Life feels easier and funnier when we are together. Karla Amador, many thanks for being such a good friend, your calls and visits during the PhD; we always grow together. Fabricio Vargas, many thanks for our time together; our laughs and talks always inspire me to move forward. Juan Ignacio Álvarez, many thanks for inspiring and reminding me the peace and joy I am to live this process. Maru Anaya and Jaime Martínez, many thanks for your friendship and for keeping an eye on me during this pandemic and the PhD. And Chel, thank you for the unconditional love and company, our walks and runs together, with sunrises and sunsets, always refreshed my mind as I conducted this research. ix ix ContentsAcknowledgements .

show abstract

Challenges and Concerns in Capture Fisheries and Aquaculture

Cited by 23 publications

References 0 publications

Routledge Handbook of Ocean Resources and Management

Routledge Handbook of Ocean Resources and Management

Participatory issues in fisheries governance in Europe

The shadow of hierarchy in marine fisheries governance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About