2005
DOI: 10.1080/17429140600622535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenges, achievements and opportunities in allelopathy research

Abstract: Allelopathy is defined as the suppression of any aspect of growth and/or development of one plant by another through the release of chemical compounds. Although allelopathic interference has been demonstrated many times using in vitro experiments, few studies have clearly demonstrated allelopathy in natural settings. This difficulty reflects the complexity in examining and demonstrating allelopathic interactions under field conditions. In this paper we address a number of issues related to the complexity of al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). The rapid onset of a strongly antagonistic microbe-by-extract effect indicates that a focus on easily extractable chemical components of cover crop residues may overestimate their potential for weed suppression in natural settings with soil microorganisms present, and our results underscore the message of previous researchers that soil microorganisms are understudied but critically important mediators of important exterminators of allelopathic activity (Inderjit 2005;Inderjit et al 2005). This antagonistic microbe-by-extract interaction may indicate microbial degradation of phytotoxic compounds.…”
Section: Microbial Interactions With Water-soluble Allelochemialssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). The rapid onset of a strongly antagonistic microbe-by-extract effect indicates that a focus on easily extractable chemical components of cover crop residues may overestimate their potential for weed suppression in natural settings with soil microorganisms present, and our results underscore the message of previous researchers that soil microorganisms are understudied but critically important mediators of important exterminators of allelopathic activity (Inderjit 2005;Inderjit et al 2005). This antagonistic microbe-by-extract interaction may indicate microbial degradation of phytotoxic compounds.…”
Section: Microbial Interactions With Water-soluble Allelochemialssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…We suggest that the allelochemicals in fresh residues were more protected from microbial degradation than when they were added as extracts, giving fresh red clover residues a longer lasting suppressiveness. While we used only the aerial parts of the red clover plant for our experiment, the roots of the plant would also be present in green manured systems; because these roots can also be a source of allelochemicals (Forney and Foy 1985;Inderjit et al 2005), they may provide additional weed suppression that what we can document here. We identified formononetin as the most important allelochemical in the fresh residue treatments (Fig.…”
Section: Microbial Interactions With Solid Residue Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, phytotoxic activity in nature depends on the release of a mixture of phytotoxins and joint effects of them rather than an individual chemical (Reigosa et al 1999;Inderjit & Duke 2003). Hence, plant extracts with phytotoxins showing synergistic, additive, or antagonistic mixture effects were shown to have higher and longer lasting effects on target species than individual chemical (Inderjit et al 2005;Koul & Walia 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural environments, allelopathy has been implicated in plant invasions, which is a major ecological problem (Bousquet-Mélou et al 2005). In agriculture, the release of toxic substances into the soil can be exploited not only for sustainable cropping systems in crop rotation, but also for weed management systems through the use of cover crops (Putnam 1986;Weston 1996;Duke et al 2000a;Weston and Duke 2003;Inderjit et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%