2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2014.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenge problem: 1. Model validation of circulating fluidized beds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The underestimation of the pressure drop at higher solids circulation rate was mainly due to the simplification of the riser exit, and the 'simple' exit in the present simulation cannot account for the possible solids refluxing behavior at the top of the experimental riser, which would induce some particles from the top of the riser to flow toward the lower part of the riser and this would further increase the pressure loss across the experimental riser. Previous simulation works also indicated that the riser-only simulation tends to underestimate the pressure drop in the riser [21,61]. The full-loop simulation of the entire CFB system is expected to better predict the pressure drop in the riser.…”
Section: Comparison Between Model Results and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underestimation of the pressure drop at higher solids circulation rate was mainly due to the simplification of the riser exit, and the 'simple' exit in the present simulation cannot account for the possible solids refluxing behavior at the top of the experimental riser, which would induce some particles from the top of the riser to flow toward the lower part of the riser and this would further increase the pressure loss across the experimental riser. Previous simulation works also indicated that the riser-only simulation tends to underestimate the pressure drop in the riser [21,61]. The full-loop simulation of the entire CFB system is expected to better predict the pressure drop in the riser.…”
Section: Comparison Between Model Results and Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the comparison could not be performed for high-solid-concentration flows since LDA is effective only for dilute suspensions. Panday et al [5] compared the time-average solid velocity in a CFB obtained by a dual multi fibre optical probe with data obtained by high-speed particle image velocimetry. Good agreement was observed between the results of these two techniques, but the comparison was limited to one operating condition and few locations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, many researchers have attempted to characterize the hydrodynamics of the circulating fluidized bed (CFB) risers. Even the competitions involving hydrodynamic modeling of the CFB riser were arranged in the form of challenge problems for the last 20 years [1], [2], [3]. Researchers working in the multiphase flow area participated in these challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%