2014
DOI: 10.1177/1077801214551288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Challenge and Opportunity in Evaluating a Diffusion-Based Active Bystanding Prevention Program

Abstract: Increasing attention has recently been paid to the development of prevention programs designed to actively engage bystanders in prevention efforts to reduce the risk of sexual and dating violence; yet, few evaluations have been conducted. Our proposed plan to rigorously evaluate a randomized intervention trial of the Green Dot bystander program as it is implemented in high schools across Kentucky is presented. We highlight the value of measuring violence victimization and perpetration outcomes, capturing actua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To categorize students as having experienced SA or not, we used the three items assessing past‐year SA in Cook‐Craig et al. 's () measure of victimization and perpetration. These items assessed instances in which students had unwanted sexual activities because the student was drunk or on drugs, the perpetrator used coercion by threatening to end the friendship or relationship or pressuring the student through arguments or begging, or the perpetrator used physical force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To categorize students as having experienced SA or not, we used the three items assessing past‐year SA in Cook‐Craig et al. 's () measure of victimization and perpetration. These items assessed instances in which students had unwanted sexual activities because the student was drunk or on drugs, the perpetrator used coercion by threatening to end the friendship or relationship or pressuring the student through arguments or begging, or the perpetrator used physical force.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, rigorous evaluations of programs including Second Step ©22 and Safe Dates 23 provide support that programs originally developed for one form a violence, bullying/aggression and TDV (respectively), can be effective at preventing other forms of violence including homophobic teasing, sexual harassment, school weapon carrying, and peer violence victimization and perpetration. Ongoing evaluations of TDV prevention programs including Dating Matters ®2426 and Green Dot 27 also may provide additional evidence in the future that schools and communities can prevent other forms of violence involving youth with a single comprehensive approach. Comprehensive approaches may be a more efficient use of resources for schools than multiple prevention strategies that address each form of violence individually.…”
Section: Implications For School Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficacy of the Green Dot bystander intervention to reduce dating violence and sexual violence acceptance. Because violence acceptance scores differed by sex at baseline (Cook-Craig et al 2014), analyses were conducted by sex. Analyses of violence acceptance and bystander behaviors were identified in clinicaltrials.gov as secondary or intermediate outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%