1987
DOI: 10.2475/ajs.287.7.661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chains of basement uplifts within cratons marginal to orogenic belts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such thickening of the midcrustal layers presumably reflects the crustal thickening processes that are commonly associated with mountain building. These same processes are responsible for a contrast in [Rodgers, 1987].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Such thickening of the midcrustal layers presumably reflects the crustal thickening processes that are commonly associated with mountain building. These same processes are responsible for a contrast in [Rodgers, 1987].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Intracontinental mountains such as the Atlas, the Palmyride Mountains of Syria, and the Tien Shan in central Asia are located at considerable distances inboard of their respective plate boundaries and commonly involve reactivated basement structures (e.g., Rodgers 1987;Letouzey 1990). They are further characterized by the absence of several diagnostic features present in typical interplate mountains, including nappe structures, ophiolites, regional metamorphism, and granitoid intrusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5A-C) [5]. Balancing and rheology considerations make such a gentle folding interpretation improbable [67], however, and we infer that the AntiAtlas basement uplifts must be associated with a series of major crustal scale reverse faults, supposedly in a Windriver-style well known in the foreland of the Rocky Mountains [67,76,94]. This uncommon proposal is illustrated in a section across the western tip of the Adrar Zouggar anticlinorium (Fig.…”
Section: The Anti-atlas Chain -What Kind Of Fold Belt?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On closer inspection, however, and in stark contrast to the frontal Appalachian chain, the AntiAtlas fold belt does not easily conform with the standard anatomy of foreland fold-and-thrust belts worldwide [77]. The most striking difference is the existence of major basement domes at a very short distance behind the deformation front [76]. Similarities exist with Wind River-style basement uplifts of the frontal Rocky Mountains, but in the Anti-Atlas, the basement uplifts occur amidst a tightly folded thick Palaeozoic cover series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%