2011
DOI: 10.1063/1.3541824
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chain stiffness, salt valency, and concentration influences on titration curves of polyelectrolytes: Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract: Monte Carlo simulations have been used to study two different models of a weak linear polyelectrolyte surrounded by explicit counterions and salt particles: (i) a rigid rod and (ii) a flexible chain. We focused on the influence of the pH, chain stiffness, salt concentration, and valency on the polyelectrolyte titration process and conformational properties. It is shown that chain acid-base properties and conformational properties are strongly modified when multivalent salt concentration variation ranges below … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative prefactor defines a deprotonation reaction (diss) and a positive prefactor, vice versa assigns a protonation reaction (ass). Moreover, it has to be noted that the proposal probability for a protonation or deprotonation reaction in the constant pH method is asymmetric [11,30,31,15,16,17,14,18]. This can be shown by comparing the proposal probability for a deprotonation reaction which reads g(diss|ass) = NHA/N0, with the proposal probability for a protonation reaction defined as g(ass|diss) = N A − /N0, which implies g(ass|diss) = g(diss|ass).…”
Section: The Constant Ph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A negative prefactor defines a deprotonation reaction (diss) and a positive prefactor, vice versa assigns a protonation reaction (ass). Moreover, it has to be noted that the proposal probability for a protonation or deprotonation reaction in the constant pH method is asymmetric [11,30,31,15,16,17,14,18]. This can be shown by comparing the proposal probability for a deprotonation reaction which reads g(diss|ass) = NHA/N0, with the proposal probability for a protonation reaction defined as g(ass|diss) = N A − /N0, which implies g(ass|diss) = g(diss|ass).…”
Section: The Constant Ph Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method was originally developed to simulate linear polyelectrolytes in presence and absence of excess salt and counterions [11,12,13,14] and reveals a good agreement with analytical results [15]. More effort was additionally spent on the study of different solvent conditions and their influence on polyelectrolyte conformations [16,17] and the properties of polyampholytes [18,5]. Moreover, the constant pH method can also be employed in slightly modified versions [19] in order to analyze shifts in the apparent reaction constant for proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned, however, that PDEAEMA is a polyelectrolyte with ionizable groups whose degree of ionization depends on pH but also on ionic strength. In general, the degree of ionization of polyelectrolytes with weak acid or basic groups increases with the ionic strength, which has been previously analyzed with a similar coarse‐grained model as well . In any case, this dependence implies some coupling between charge and salt effects, which makes the discrimination between them quite difficult.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In general, the degree of ionization of polyelectrolytes with weak acid or basic groups increases with the ionic strength, which has been previously analyzed with a similar coarse-grained model as well. 46 In any case, this dependence implies some coupling between charge and salt effects, which makes the discrimination between them quite difficult. In this sense, computer simulations are extremely helpful since such effects can be easily decoupled and differentiated, as discussed previously.…”
Section: Salt Concentration Inside Gelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,15,[21][22][23][24][25]. For systems with a small number of sites (N ≤ 20), the necessary thermal averages can be performed by direct enumeration, while for a large number of sites Monte Carlo (MC) simulations become necessary [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%