1980
DOI: 10.1016/0012-365x(80)90033-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chain enumeration and non-crossing partitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
138
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
138
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These theorems result from our formulae for the (combinatorial) decomposition numbers upon appropriate summations. Subsequently, it is shown that the corresponding formulae imply all known enumeration results on non-crossing partitions and generalised non-crossing partitions, plus several new ones; see Corollaries 12,14,[16][17][18][19] and the accompanying remarks. Section 9 presents the announced computational proof of the F = M (ex-)Conjecture for type D n , based on our formula in Corollary 19 for the rank-selected chain enumeration in the poset of generalised non-crossing partitions of type D n , while Section 10 addresses Conjecture 3.5.13 from [1], showing that it does not hold in general since it fails in type D n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These theorems result from our formulae for the (combinatorial) decomposition numbers upon appropriate summations. Subsequently, it is shown that the corresponding formulae imply all known enumeration results on non-crossing partitions and generalised non-crossing partitions, plus several new ones; see Corollaries 12,14,[16][17][18][19] and the accompanying remarks. Section 9 presents the announced computational proof of the F = M (ex-)Conjecture for type D n , based on our formula in Corollary 19 for the rank-selected chain enumeration in the poset of generalised non-crossing partitions of type D n , while Section 10 addresses Conjecture 3.5.13 from [1], showing that it does not hold in general since it fails in type D n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The subject has been enriched by Armstrong through the introduction of his generalised non-crossing partitions for reflection groups in [1]. In the symmetric group case, these reduce to the m-divisible non-crossing partitions of Edelman [18], while they produce new combinatorial objects already for the reflection groups of type B n . Again, these generalised non-crossing partitions possess numerous beautiful properties and seem to relate to several other objects of combinatorics and algebra, most notably to the generalised cluster complex of Fomin and Reading [19] (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These follow immediately by extending the bijection given in Proposition 4.2 to count multichains in N C (B) (p, q), similar to Theorem 3.2 of [7] and Proposition 7 of [11]. …”
Section: Zeta Polynomial and Möbius Function For N C (B) (P Q)mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…First defined and studied by Germain Kreweras in 1972 [33], it caught the imagination of combinatorialists beginning in the 1980s [20], [21], [22], [23], [29], [37], [39], [40], [45], and has come to be regarded as one of the standard objects in the field. In recent years it has also played a role in areas as diverse as lowdimensional topology and geometric group theory [9], [12], [13], [31], [32] as well as the noncommutative version of probability [2], [3], [35], [41], [42], [43], [49], [50].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%