2020
DOI: 10.33963/kp.15102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as tools for long-term mortality prognosis in patients with typical atrial flutter after catheter ablation

Abstract: The pathophysiology for AFL is different as compared with AF. The success rate of radiofrequency catheter ablation in the management of AFL is much higher compared with AF ablation, 9 and consequently, prognosis of patients with AFL might be significantly different. 10 Data regarding long -term mortality after ablation in patients with typical AFL is limited and conflicting, and the utility of CHADS 2 and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores in the AFL population for mortality assessment has never been studied.ABSTRACT BAC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend the use of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (chronic heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years (doubled), diabetes, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (doubled), vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and female gender) to assess the risk of stroke in patients with AF; however, its usefulness is not limited solely to this [ 18 ]. Over the years, it has been extensively tested as a predictor of short-term and long-term mortality in various subpopulations, such as in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or on hemodialysis [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Additionally, its predictive value was compared to other scores directly related to AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommend the use of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (chronic heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years (doubled), diabetes, history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (doubled), vascular disease, age 65–74 years, and female gender) to assess the risk of stroke in patients with AF; however, its usefulness is not limited solely to this [ 18 ]. Over the years, it has been extensively tested as a predictor of short-term and long-term mortality in various subpopulations, such as in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or on hemodialysis [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Additionally, its predictive value was compared to other scores directly related to AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Шкала стратификации риска инсульта у больных с ФП включает кроме гемодинамических параметров -СД [25,26]. Усовершенствованная оценка риска ОНМК CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc также сохраняет значительное влияние СД на прогноз этого осложнения ФП [27][28][29].…”
unclassified