2021
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChAdOx1 vaccination, blood coagulation, and inflammation: No effect on coagulation but increased interleukin‐6

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creat ive Commo ns Attri butio n-NonCo mmerc ial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following that, several cases of thrombotic events accompanied by thrombocytopenia have been observed and linked to the administration of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine; Denmark, pursued by several European countries, was the first country to suspend the use of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine [ 20 ]. Nevertheless, research data could not recognize platelet dysfunction in Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccinated population [ 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, the WHO and the European Medicines Agency declared that the trend of hypercoagulability could not be vindicated and recommended continued vaccination by the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following that, several cases of thrombotic events accompanied by thrombocytopenia have been observed and linked to the administration of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine; Denmark, pursued by several European countries, was the first country to suspend the use of the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine [ 20 ]. Nevertheless, research data could not recognize platelet dysfunction in Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccinated population [ 21 , 22 ]. Therefore, the WHO and the European Medicines Agency declared that the trend of hypercoagulability could not be vindicated and recommended continued vaccination by the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine [ 23 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azzarone et al hypothesized that in vaccine recipients suffering from local inflammatory reaction, an early event is represented by the production of interleukin 6 (IL-6) ( 3 ) which favors endothelial cells reactivity and induces plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 ( 51 , 52 ), the main physiological inhibitor of the plasminogen activators in the bloodstream ( 53 ). A confirmation of the hypothesis came from an observational study demonstrating that 24-48h following Vaxzevria vaccination, the IL-6 levels were almost doubled ( 54 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…An important sidenote is that the COVID-19 booster vaccination campaign was initiated during the course of this study. Vaccination against COVID-19 has been shown to increase IL-6 levels with an early small peak 1 day after vaccination [ 29 , 30 ]. Recent research demonstrates that a vaccination-induced IL-6 level increase is no longer present at 4 weeks after vaccination [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, the COVID-19 vaccination may have resulted in higher levels of IL-6 at 18 months versus 3 months post-COVID-19 in some participants. No changes in IL-18 levels have been observed after COVID-19 vaccination [ 29 ]. Another important issue is that ageing is associated with a chronic progressive increase in the proinflammatory status, called inflammaging [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%