2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFETR equilibrium with self-consistent pedestal structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EPED model [11][12][13] in which the pedestal structure is determined by the two constraints of the peeling-ballooning mode (PBM) [14][15][16][17] and the kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) [18] has been widely used to successfully predict the pedestal structure in many tokamak devices for D plasmas [12,13,19]. It has also been used to predict the pedestal structure for ITER [11] and CFETR [20,21]. In general, the model is suitable to predict the pedestal structure for different main ion species, and it has been used to perform a predictive calculation of pedestal structure for H and D main ion H-mode discharges on DIII-D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPED model [11][12][13] in which the pedestal structure is determined by the two constraints of the peeling-ballooning mode (PBM) [14][15][16][17] and the kinetic ballooning mode (KBM) [18] has been widely used to successfully predict the pedestal structure in many tokamak devices for D plasmas [12,13,19]. It has also been used to predict the pedestal structure for ITER [11] and CFETR [20,21]. In general, the model is suitable to predict the pedestal structure for different main ion species, and it has been used to perform a predictive calculation of pedestal structure for H and D main ion H-mode discharges on DIII-D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EPED model [6][7][8] was developed with an additional constraint, which is the kinetic-ballooning mode (KBM) [9], then the pedestal height and width can be completely determined by the two constraints of PBM and KBM. This predictive model has been widely validated in several tokamak devices [6,10,11], and has also been applied to predict the pedestal structure of future tokamaks (such as the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) and the China Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR)) [7,[12][13][14]. Nevertheless, detailed studies between type I ELMs have shown the quasi-coherent fluctuations limited the pedestal growth on Alcator C-Mod [15], and it appears to be consistent with a soft limit of the edge pedestal set by the KBM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%