2021
DOI: 10.3390/ph14060596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

cfDNA Sequencing: Technological Approaches and Bioinformatic Issues

Abstract: In the era of precision medicine, it is crucial to identify molecular alterations that will guide the therapeutic management of patients. In this context, circulating tumoral DNA (ctDNA) released by the tumor in body fluids, like blood, and carrying its molecular characteristics is becoming a powerful biomarker for non-invasive detection and monitoring of cancer. Major recent technological advances, especially in terms of sequencing, have made possible its analysis, the challenge still being its reliable early… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the last several years, significant progress has been made in the development of ctDNA detection methods. PCR-based sequencing, which includes real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and digital PCR (dPCR) methods, is an alternative method for single-locus/multiplexed tests and targeted panels, while Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based sequencing, which includes Tagged-Amplicon deep sequencing (TAM-Seq), CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-Seq), and Duplex sequencing can be applied to panels of any size ( 1 , 2 ). Notably, the revolution in ctDNA-based liquid biopsies has opened up new opportunities for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring, and treatment guidance ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last several years, significant progress has been made in the development of ctDNA detection methods. PCR-based sequencing, which includes real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR), and digital PCR (dPCR) methods, is an alternative method for single-locus/multiplexed tests and targeted panels, while Next Generation Sequencing (NGS)-based sequencing, which includes Tagged-Amplicon deep sequencing (TAM-Seq), CAncer Personalized Profiling by deep sequencing (CAPP-Seq), and Duplex sequencing can be applied to panels of any size ( 1 , 2 ). Notably, the revolution in ctDNA-based liquid biopsies has opened up new opportunities for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring, and treatment guidance ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the need to detect low mutation rates within the drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains 19 or drug-resistance colorectal cancer 20 has been reported. Some common qPCR diagnostics methods using DNA polymerases lacking proofreading activity, like blocker displacement amplification (BDA) 21 , allele-specific PCR (As-PCR) 22,23 , amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS-PCR) 24,25 , competitive allele-specific TaqMan PCR (Cast-PCR) 26,27 , and coamplification at lower denaturation temperature PCR (COLD-PCR) 28 , mainly have a limit of detection (LoD) around 0.1% to 1% VAF which is no longer satisfactory 29 . The high polymerase misincorporation rate 30 from the lack of the proofreading activity could introduce false-positive mutations into generated amplicons, thus obscuring readouts in qPCR methods and restricting the LoD (Figure S1A).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid biopsy failed to detect tumor-specific variants that were presented in the tumor with low VAF, which strongly suggests that more sensitive sequencing approaches are needed to capture these variants reliably. In practice, this often means even deeper sequencing or the use of more sophisticated methods such as unique molecular identifiers [ 43 ]. At the same, there is an apparent pressure to perform liquid biopsy as cost-effectively as possible so that the liquid biopsy can truly compete with tumor DNA sequencing which is often more affordable option in clinics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%