2002
DOI: 10.1205/026387602753393402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Study of Homogenization with Dual Rushton Turbines—Comparison with Experimental Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Effect of impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio on power number for batch vessels has also been reported extensively (Rushton et al, 1950;Bates et al, 1963;Bujalski et al, 1987;Ibrahim and Nienow, 1995;Chapple et al, 2002). Two studies report on the effect of impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio on the power number for a pump-mixer (Singh et al, 2003(Singh et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Effect of impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio on power number for batch vessels has also been reported extensively (Rushton et al, 1950;Bates et al, 1963;Bujalski et al, 1987;Ibrahim and Nienow, 1995;Chapple et al, 2002). Two studies report on the effect of impeller diameter to tank diameter ratio on the power number for a pump-mixer (Singh et al, 2003(Singh et al, , 2004.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Consequently, several general approaches have been reported in literature on explicit simulation of whole flow field in agitated tanks. The three main generalized approaches are multiple reference frame (MRF) approach (Luo et al, 1994;Bujalski et al, 2002), computational snapshot approach (Ranade et al, 1996(Ranade et al, , 2001) and sliding mesh (SM) approach (Perng and Murthy, 1993;Murthy et al, 1994;Tabor et al, 1996;Lee et al, 1996;Daskopoulos and Harris, 1996). While the first two approaches involve steady state computations and produce time averaged flow field, the third approach involves transient computations to produce time accurate flow field.…”
Section: Cfd Modeling Of Mechanically Agitated Baffled Tanksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the outer region, the relatively small time derivative terms can be neglected. Upon comparing numerical predictions obtained from applying different impeller modeling methodologies, several investigators observed that steady state methods such as MRF can i. provide reasonable predictions to flow field features and power consumption (Jaworski et al, 2001;Bujalski et al, 2002;Kelly & Gigas, 2003;Khopkar et al, 2004;Aubin et al, 2004;Sommerfeld & Decker, 2004;Khopkar et al, 2006), and ii. save about one-seventh of the CPU-time (Brucato et al, 1998).…”
Section: Simulation Of Impeller Rotationmentioning
confidence: 99%