2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulations of premixed hydrogen combustion using the Eddy Dissipation and the Turbulent Flame Closure models

Abstract: This paper presents a CFD simulation of premixed combustion tests, and centers around a comparison between the classical Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM) and the more sophisticated Turbulent Flame Closure (TFC) model. The chosen tests relate to hydrogen-air deflagration experiments in the THAI and ENACCEF facilities, featuring respectively slow and fast dynamics. Validation of the models is accomplished by comparing model predictions against important measured combustion parameters (flame velocity and spatial prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The eddy current dissipation model, whose reaction rate is controlled by turbulent mixing, is used for nonpremixed flames. In combination with literature (Hassan et al, 2010;Halouane and Dehbi, 2017;Hoste et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020;Tian, 2020), the ED eddy dissipation model, which is applied to the LES turbulence model is adopted for combustion model, and the simple algorithm is used for iterative solution with an iterative time step of 0.0005 s. The reliability of the turbulence and combustion model is verified below.…”
Section: Reliability Verification Of Turbulence and Combustion Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The eddy current dissipation model, whose reaction rate is controlled by turbulent mixing, is used for nonpremixed flames. In combination with literature (Hassan et al, 2010;Halouane and Dehbi, 2017;Hoste et al, 2019;Chen et al, 2020;Tian, 2020), the ED eddy dissipation model, which is applied to the LES turbulence model is adopted for combustion model, and the simple algorithm is used for iterative solution with an iterative time step of 0.0005 s. The reliability of the turbulence and combustion model is verified below.…”
Section: Reliability Verification Of Turbulence and Combustion Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Euler-Euler multiphase model [34][35][36] was used to describe the motion of the twophase flow in the steam generator flow part. The principal model equations are given below: The Eddy Dissipation Model (EDM) [37,38] was used for describing the combustion process: , The description of the complex heat transfer between the gas, flame and walls in the paper accounts for radiant heat transfer by using the P1 model [29,33,38]. The equation of the P1 radiant heat transfer model has the form:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling using RANS and TFC approaches has been validated in the literature for a number of different cases-flame interaction with obstacle-induced turbulence [14][15][16][17]25,26], fan-stirred explosion bomb [27], slow deflagrations [28], upwards hydrogen flame propagation in larger closed volume [29], combustion in pipelines [30] and fan-stirred combustion vessel [31].…”
Section: Flamefoammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to obstacle-driven turbulent flame acceleration, the RANS method suitability has been demonstrated in a number of cases. For example, in several works by different authors [14][15][16][17], numerical simulations of hydrogen flame propagation in a large-scale facility-ENACCEF acceleration tube-was performed employing URANS, and turbulent flame speed closure approaches with varying but generally satisfactory accuracy. In [18], URANS based simulations were used to investigate the deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) process in a channel with arc obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%