2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2011.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD simulations of horizontal ground heat exchangers: A comparison among different configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
124
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results demonstrated lower consumption of electricity and higher seasonal performance factor when mains water was used. The Research Center for Energy and Environment in Lecce [6] verified the basic configuration of horizontal ground source heat exchangers. Throughout the year the researchers there measured the temperatures of the soil and the thermal output discharged by the heat exchangers.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated lower consumption of electricity and higher seasonal performance factor when mains water was used. The Research Center for Energy and Environment in Lecce [6] verified the basic configuration of horizontal ground source heat exchangers. Throughout the year the researchers there measured the temperatures of the soil and the thermal output discharged by the heat exchangers.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The installation depth of the helix, with the bottom lying at 1.0 m and the top at 0.60 m depth, is deliberately chosen, on one hand, to verify if at 0.60 m depth, according to industrial partner experience, the effect of soil thermal conductivity is dominant compared to that of the daily temperature amplitude [26]; on the other, to force the growing and potential merging of the ice radius around the helix and see the reaction of the surrounding soil. In addition, the selected installation depth allows to reduce the installation costs.…”
Section: Test Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…and to the local geological and environmental conditions [22][23][24][25]. Recent works have concluded that helical heat exchangers, known as helix systems, provide the best thermal performance compared to common horizontal loop systems, even if they need more tube length [26]. Moreover, they are also a valid alternative to vertical systems installed at shallow depths (up to 25 m) [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are still relatively few numerical solutions to the ground heat transfer problem for new GHEs shapes because of their novelty. In [11], the effect of the depth of installation and the soil thermal conductivity on the performance of three different heat exchangers (straight, helical and slinky-coil) is investigated. In [4,12] the commercial code FEFLOW is used to simulate the energy performance of a slinky-coil, taking into account the energy balance at the ground surface and new spatial arrangements, whereas in [5] FEFLOW is implemented to make a comparison between the energy behaviour of a flatpanel and a radiator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%