CFD simulation of wind loads of kilometer‐scale super tall buildings with typical configurations in veering wind field

Abstract

SummaryThe atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), whose total height is about 1–1.5 km, is composed of the atmospheric surface layer (ASL) and the Ekman layer, which typically account for the lower 10% and the upper 90% of the ABL, respectively. The wind veering angle in the Ekman layer can be between 10° and 30°, which may be an important influence factor for the wind‐resistant design of kilometer‐scale super‐tall buildings. Unfortunately, there is very little research on this issue so far due to the difficulty in simulations of veering wind in wind tunnels and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation platforms. In this study, the simulations of non‐veering and veering wind fields are presented, and furthermore, the wind loads of kilometer‐scale super tall buildings with several typical configurations in veering wind fields are numerically investigated. Specifically, the large eddy simulations (LES) of unsteady flow around three buildings, namely, a square building, a tapered building (tapering ratio: 6.6%), and a 4‐layer setback building with the same height and the same aspect ratio of 9:1, are systematically performed for the cases of veering wind and non‐veering wind. The wind pressures and wind forces on these buildings are obtained and comprehensively analyzed. The differences in the wind loads among the building configurations are highlighted, and the mechanisms are discussed based on the time‐averaged and instantaneous flow fields.

Wind-Induced Aerodynamic Effects on Set-Back Tall Buildings Using LES

“…It is known that LES can simulate near-wall flow and complex flow structures, thereby enhancing the improvement in the resolution of a calculated flow field. Previous research has confirmed the validity and accuracy of LES through comparisons with wind tunnel tests and other numerical simulation methods [20][21][22]. The wind load and aerodynamic performance of the square and trapped building models were estimated by using LES [23,24].…”