16th AIAA/DLR/DGLR International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference 2009
DOI: 10.2514/6.2009-7349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD Simulation of Hypersonic TBCC Inlet Mode Transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar responses were recorded when disturbances were applied to the LS Path ramp position. These simulation results agree with known CFD results, that the LS Path normalshock position is sensitive to changes in ramp and cowl position 10 . Hence, it is necessary to fine-tune actuators control parameters to avoid servo oscillations and reduce the probability of inlet unstart during mode transition.…”
Section: The Simulation Results Insupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar responses were recorded when disturbances were applied to the LS Path ramp position. These simulation results agree with known CFD results, that the LS Path normalshock position is sensitive to changes in ramp and cowl position 10 . Hence, it is necessary to fine-tune actuators control parameters to avoid servo oscillations and reduce the probability of inlet unstart during mode transition.…”
Section: The Simulation Results Insupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As mentioned earlier, this is not possible if the LS Path cowl angle is fixed at zero-degree. These simulation results agree with CFD analyses 10 , that it is possible to achieve good stability and performance for inlet mode-transition with air-bypass control, combined with proper handling of inlet variable-geometry and matching exit-flow BC's.…”
Section: B Mode-transition Control Simulationsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The operation mode transition from turbojet to ramjet is also one of the important research directions for TBCC propulsion systems. In 2009, Slater et al carried out a steady-state CFD simulation at different splitter cowl positions (0, −2.0, −4.0, −5.7 deg) for the inlet mode transition flow field at Mach 4 from turbine flow-path to parallel dualmode ramjet/scramjet in a TBCC propulsion system [14]. Research indicated the accurate modeling of shock waves, boundary layers and porous bleed regions were dominant factors for assessing the inlet static and total pressure, bleed flow rates and bleed plenum pressures [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1; a diverter door will rotate to close the low-speed flow path as the high-speed engine takes over. This low-speed mode transition is very critical since unstart of the lowspeed inlet and the high-speed inlet might occur [8]. The opening and closing of the nozzle doors of the separate flow paths as well as the interaction of the two exhaust streams are the operational challenges that are inherent in this type of TBCC configuration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%