2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2016.09.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CFD modelling of moisture evaporation in an industrial dispersed system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tran et al apply the CDRC model in their CFD modeling of skim milk spray drying and found satisfactory accuracy for the entire range of modeled drying conditions [ 133 ]. Wawrzyniak et al similarly utilized this approach to model the mass transfer in the droplets in their CFD simulations of a drying tower [ 134 ]. This approach has also been applied in CFD simulations of the drying of sucrose-maltodextrin solutions in a spray dryer by Woo et al and for the drying of droplets of skim milk by Patel et al [ 135 , 136 , 137 ].…”
Section: Physics Of Particle Formation From a Drying Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tran et al apply the CDRC model in their CFD modeling of skim milk spray drying and found satisfactory accuracy for the entire range of modeled drying conditions [ 133 ]. Wawrzyniak et al similarly utilized this approach to model the mass transfer in the droplets in their CFD simulations of a drying tower [ 134 ]. This approach has also been applied in CFD simulations of the drying of sucrose-maltodextrin solutions in a spray dryer by Woo et al and for the drying of droplets of skim milk by Patel et al [ 135 , 136 , 137 ].…”
Section: Physics Of Particle Formation From a Drying Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above-presented literature for modeling the two-phase spray drying processes, authors used the Eulerian-Lagrangian multiphase modeling approach based on the Particle-Source-In Cell (PSI-CELL) model of Crowe et al [37] The choice for the turbulence model depended on the type of inlet flow. For low to moderate swirling flows, as encountered in co-current spray dryer geometries, the standard k-epsilon turbulence model has shown good accuracy [28,31,32,34,38,39], while for highly swirling flows such as those encountered in counter-current dryers, the Reynolds Stress Model [6,36,40], k-omega SST model [41], or k-epsilon RNG [29,42,43] were recommended. Furthermore, using reflecting particle-wall boundary conditions provided more accurate results than escape particle-wall boundary conditions [6,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wawrzyniak et al [36] validated a 3D, transient CFD model to the experimental temperature and velocity measurements for an industrial spray drying tower. The model followed a similar trend with the experiments; however, due to the high swirling and an unsteady flow near the inlets and mixing zones, large discrepancies were observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20) In addition, the effect of drying condition and the drying tower geometry on the fluid behavior and droplet trajectory have been investigated. [21][22][23][24][25] Recently, the CFD studies that considered the collision between droplets (or particles) and deposition on a spray dryer wall have increased, and the importance of the boundary condition between a particle and wall has been discussed. [26][27][28][29][30] Previous studies have primarily focused on a single droplet drying or the overall fluid and droplet drying behaviors inside a spray dryer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%